Benzema’s decision to step away from the French national team came after a tumultuous period that saw him miss the entire 2022 World Cup due to a quadriceps injury. He had been named in the initial squad but withdrew before the first match, and France went on to lose the final to Argentina on penalties. Despite not playing a single minute, Benzema remained officially part of the squad, but his relationship with the team and manager Didier Deschamps had already been strained for years.

Benzema’s Turbulent International Career

Benzema made 97 appearances and scored 37 goals for France, a record that places him among the top scorers in the nation’s history. However, his international career was consistently overshadowed by off-field controversies and injuries. He was infamously excluded from the 2018 World Cup squad that went on to win the title in Russia. At the time, the French Football Federation (FFF) cited an ongoing internal investigation into his alleged involvement in a blackmail plot against teammate Mathieu Valbuena, known as the "sex tape scandal." Benzema denied any wrongdoing, but the controversy cost him a spot in the team for nearly six years.

He was eventually recalled for Euro 2020, where he scored four goals and reminded fans of his exceptional talent. But the return was short-lived. After Euro 2020, Benzema struggled with fitness and form, and his relationship with Deschamps deteriorated further. The 2022 World Cup injury was the final straw, leading Benzema to announce his international retirement at the age of 34, stating that he had "written his story" with France.

Club Brilliance vs International Frustration

Benzema’s club career stands in stark contrast to his international journey. At Real Madrid, he became one of the greatest strikers in the club’s history, winning five UEFA Champions League titles, four La Liga titles, and numerous other trophies. In 2022, he won the Ballon d’Or after a stellar season where he scored 44 goals in 46 matches, including crucial strikes in the Champions League knockout stages. His ability to link play, create chances, and finish with precision made him a unique forward.

After leaving Real Madrid in 2023, Benzema joined Al Hilal in the Saudi Pro League, following a trend of top European stars moving to the Middle East. While some critics viewed the move as a step down, Benzema continued to perform at a high level, adapting his game to a different style of football. In the 2025-26 season, he scored nine goals and assisted two in the league, showing that he could still influence matches. Despite his club exploits, Benzema’s absence from the French national team has left a void that younger players like Randal Kolo Muani and Marcus Thuram have tried to fill, but none possess the same combination of experience and versatility.

Historical Context: France’s Striker Legacy

France has a rich history of world-class strikers, from Just Fontaine to Thierry Henry to Antoine Griezmann. Benzema’s international career falls short of the heights achieved by Henry (51 goals) or even Olivier Giroud (57 goals as of 2026), but his skill set was arguably more complete. His exclusion from the 2018 winning team remains a sore point for many fans, who wonder what might have been if Benzema had been part of that squad. Some analysts argue that the team’s chemistry was better without him, while others believe his presence could have added an extra dimension in tight matches.

The 2026 World Cup campaign represents a new era for France. Younger talents like Eduardo Camavinga, Aurelien Tchouameni, and Kylian Mbappé (who now captains the side) are leading the charge. Senegal, their first opponent, presents a stern test with a talented squad including Sadio Mané and Kalidou Koulibaly. France will rely on Mbappé’s pace and finishing, but without Benzema, they lack a seasoned forward who can drop deep and orchestrate play.

Impact of Benzema’s Retirement on the Team

Benzema’s retirement has forced Deschamps to rethink his attacking options. In the years since 2022, France has experimented with various formations and forwards. Griezmann has often played as a false nine, while Giroud’s hold-up play has been valuable. However, Giroud is now 39 and no longer in the squad. The likes of Kolo Muani, Thuram, and Wissam Ben Yedder have had opportunities but have not yet cemented a permanent spot. The 2026 World Cup opener against Senegal is a chance for one of these players to stake a claim.

Benzema’s absence also affects team morale and media attention. His presence often dominated headlines, both positive and negative. Without him, the focus is more on the collective, which Deschamps has always preferred. The manager has built a tight-knit group that prioritizes team unity over individual brilliance, a philosophy that worked well in 2018. Yet, in high-pressure knockout matches, having a player of Benzema’s quality could be the difference between victory and defeat.

Benzema’s Current Form and Future

Despite his age (38 in December 2026), Benzema continues to play at a high level for Al Hilal. He has adapted his game, relying less on pace and more on positioning, intelligence, and finishing. His goal-scoring rate in the Saudi league remains impressive, and he has also contributed to the development of younger players in the squad. However, there is no indication that he will reverse his international retirement decision. In recent interviews, Benzema has expressed satisfaction with his career choices and has ruled out a return to the national team.

His legacy with France is a complicated one. He will be remembered as a supremely talented footballer who achieved the highest individual honor – the Ballon d’Or – but also as a player whose international career was marked by controversy and missed opportunities. For many French fans, Benzema represents what could have been, a striker capable of elevating the national team to even greater heights. For others, he is a symbol of the discord that sometimes brews beneath the surface of successful teams.

As France takes on Senegal in their World Cup 2026 opener, the absence of Karim Benzema is a reminder of how quickly football fortunes can change. The team that once had an embarrassment of riches in attack now must write a new chapter without one of its most gifted sons. The match will be keenly watched not only for the result but also for how France copes with the void left by one of the game’s great enigmas.

Source: Sportstar News

A Friendship That Endured

In a 2012 interview with Radar Online, Nicole Mitchell opened up about her relationship with Murphy post-divorce. "Eddie and I are friends," she said. "He's my babies' daddy, so we speak to each other and have a great relationship and I think that's important when you have children involved... We can be in the same room and hang out, it's all good!" This candid admission highlights the mutual respect and maturity that both have carried forward. Their ability to remain in each other's lives without drama has provided a stable environment for their five children: Bria (born 1989), Myles (1992), Shayne (1994), Zola (1999), and Bella (2002).

The Murphy-Mitchell Love Story

Eddie Murphy and Nicole Mitchell first met in the late 1980s, when Murphy was already a rising star thanks to his iconic run on Saturday Night Live and blockbuster films like Beverly Hills Cop. Their relationship was an on-again, off-again affair before they welcomed their first child, Bria, in November 1989. They married in 1993 and proceeded to have four more children. During their marriage, Murphy continued to dominate the box office with hits like The Nutty Professor, Dr. Dolittle, and Shrek (voice work). However, the demands of Hollywood and personal differences led to their separation in 2005 and divorce in 2006. The divorce was reportedly amicable, with Murphy agreeing to a substantial settlement to ensure Mitchell and their children were well provided for.

Co-Parenting Success

The key to Murphy and Mitchell's successful co-parenting appears to be communication and a shared priority: their children's well-being. Both have spoken publicly about the importance of being present for their kids. Murphy, despite his busy schedule, has made a point to attend family events and maintain close ties with all his children. Mitchell, who largely stepped back from the spotlight after the divorce, has focused on raising their five kids and supporting Murphy's continued role as a father. Their mutual respect is evident in how they handle milestones: graduations, birthdays, and holidays are often spent together as a family unit. This cooperative approach stands in stark contrast to some of Murphy's other relationships, which have been marked by legal battles and paternity disputes.

Eddie Murphy's Complicated Relationship History

Murphy's journey as a father began in 1989, when his first son, Eric, was born to ex-girlfriend Paulette McNeely. Just four months later, Bria was born to Mitchell. During a brief separation from Mitchell, Murphy had a relationship with Tamara Hood, resulting in son Christian (born 1990). After reconciling and marrying Mitchell, Murphy fathered four more children. But his family tree grew even more tangled in 2007 when former Spice Girl Mel B gave birth to daughter Angel. Murphy initially denied paternity, leading to a public legal battle. A DNA test confirmed he was the father, and he eventually took responsibility, though the relationship with Mel B soured. Murphy later said he regretted how that situation was handled, and he has since made efforts to co-parent Angel peacefully.

A New Chapter with Paige Butcher

In 2012, Murphy began a relationship with Australian model and actress Paige Butcher, who is 29 years his junior. They welcomed two children together: daughter Izzy in 2016 and son Max in 2018. After more than a decade of dating, Murphy and Butcher married in July 2024 in a private ceremony. The couple has maintained a relatively low profile, but Butcher is often seen with Murphy at public events and has been warmly accepted by his older children. Murphy's commitment to all his kids is evident in his words: "I never knew I would have 10 kids, but now it's the best thing ever. If you can afford that many kids, you should have as many kids as you can afford. That is fun." This quote from a 2021 interview with People magazine reflects his genuine enthusiasm for fatherhood, despite its complexities.

Keeping the Peace: How Murphy Balances His Large Family

Managing a blended family of ten children, several ex-partners, and a current spouse requires delicate diplomacy. Murphy has reportedly employed a chief of staff to help coordinate schedules and ensure that all children feel equally valued. He is known to have a close relationship with his eldest children, many of whom have pursued their own paths in entertainment or business. For instance, daughter Bria is a singer and actress, while son Myles has dabbled in music. Murphy has also been supportive of their endeavors, often attending their performances or offering career advice. The key to harmony, according to insiders, is that Murphy treats all his children fairly and never lets his romantic relationships interfere with his paternal duties.

Nicole Mitchell: Life After Divorce

Since the divorce, Nicole Mitchell has maintained a relatively private life. She has not remarried and seems content focusing on her children and personal interests. She has occasionally made public appearances with Murphy, such as at family events or children's milestones, showing that they remain on excellent terms. In a 2023 interview, Mitchell was asked about her relationship with Murphy and she reiterated their friendship, noting that time has healed any old wounds. Their ability to put their children first is a model for co-parenting success. Mitchell's maturity in handling the split is often credited by those close to her, and she has earned respect for never publicly criticizing Murphy despite the challenges of his other relationships.

The Evolution of Eddie Murphy's Family Life

Eddie Murphy's family story is one of growth, responsibility, and ultimately, love. From the chaos of paternity battles in the late 1980s and early 1990s to the peaceful coexistence with Nicole Mitchell, and now to his happy marriage with Paige Butcher, Murphy has learned valuable lessons. He once said in an interview that fatherhood changed him, making him more patient and grounded. His willingness to support his children financially and emotionally, despite the scale of his family, is admirable. In 2024, with the birth of his tenth child (some reports indicate he may have fathered a child with Butcher after their wedding, but officially they have two), Murphy shows that age has not diminished his zest for family life. He remains active in Hollywood, with upcoming projects and a legendary status that few can match.

Lessons from Murphy and Mitchell's Co-Parenting

The story of Eddie Murphy and Nicole Mitchell offers a valuable lesson: divorce does not have to mean the end of a functional relationship. By prioritizing their children and maintaining open lines of communication, they have built a foundation that allows them to celebrate together milestones and support each other through tough times. For celebrities especially, where public scrutiny is relentless, their ability to keep things positive is rare. Murphy's ex-wife has spoken highly of him, and he has reciprocated that respect. In an era where celebrity splits often turn bitter, the Murphy-Mitchell dynamic is a refreshing example of how to handle a breakup with grace.

Eddie Murphy's Legacy Beyond Comedy

While Eddie Murphy will always be remembered for his comedy genius—from his Raw stand-up special to his Oscar-nominated performance in Dreamgirls—his personal life has also shaped his legacy. He is now seen as a devoted father to a large tribe, a man who has made mistakes but has tried to correct them, and an ex-husband who remains a friend to his first wife. His relationship with Nicole Mitchell, in particular, stands as proof that it is possible to maintain a civil, even warm, post-divorce relationship. As his children grow and start families of their own, the Murphy clan is likely to remain a tight-knit group, thanks to the foundation laid by Eddie and Nicole.

Source: Yahoo Entertainment News

The 26-year-old began advocating for peace in the region soon after the conflict began on October 7. She witnessed violence while growing up in Pakistan and became a target, herself, surviving an assassination attempt as a teenager, after speaking up against the Taliban’s prohibition on girls’ education. Last month, Yousafzai said she donated $300,000 to three charities helping Palestinians and encouraged the public to sign a petition demanding Israel stop attacking schools and both sides release their child hostages.

Who Is Malala Yousafzai?

Malala Yousafzai, often known simply as Malala, is a Pakistani girls’ education activist who survived an assassination attempt at age 15 and became the youngest person to win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2014. Yousafzai began advocating for girls’ education when she was still a child, which resulted in the Taliban issuing a death threat against her. In October 2012, a gunman shot Yousafzai when she was traveling home from school. The activist survived, became a Nobel laureate at age 17, and continues her work through her international nonprofit, Malala Fund. She has written several books, including the best-selling memoir I Am Malala, and helped produce the 2022 Oscar-nominated documentary short Stranger at the Gate.

Quick Facts

FULL NAME: Malala Yousafzai
BORN: July 12, 1997
BIRTHPLACE: Mingora, Pakistan
SPOUSE: Asser Malik (2021-present)
ASTROLOGICAL SIGN: Cancer

Early Life and Activism

Malala Yousafzai was born on July 12, 1997, in Mingora, Pakistan, located in the country’s northern Swat Valley. For the first few years of her life, Yousafzai’s hometown remained a popular tourist spot that was known for its summer festivals. The area began to change as the Taliban tried to take control. Yousafzai’s father, Ziauddin, is an educator, but her mother, Tor Pekai, was illiterate until she was in her 40s. The couple always supported their daughter’s education. Malala attended a school that her father had founded.

After the Taliban began attacking girls schools in Swat, 11-year-old Yousafzai gave a speech in Peshawar, Pakistan, in September 2008. The title of her talk was, “How Dare the Taliban Take Away My Basic Right to Education?” In early 2009, Yousafzai began blogging for the BBC about living under the Taliban’s threats to deny her an education. In order to hide her identity, she used the name Gul Makai. However, her identity was revealed that December. With a growing public platform, Yousafzai continued to speak out about her right, and the right of all women, to an education. Her activism resulted in a nomination for the International Children’s Peace Prize in 2011. That same year, she was awarded Pakistan’s National Youth Peace Prize.

Yousafzai and her family learned that the Taliban had issued a death threat against her because of her activism. Although Malala was frightened for the safety of her father—an anti-Taliban activist—she and her family initially felt that the fundamentalist group would not actually harm a child.

Shot by the Taliban

On October 9, 2012, when 15-year-old Yousafzai was riding a bus with friends on their way home from school, a masked gunman boarded the bus and demanded to know which girl was Yousafzai. When friends looked toward her, Yousafzai was given away. The gunman fired at her, hitting the girl in the left side of her head; the bullet then traveled down her neck. Two other girls were also injured in the attack. The shooting left Yousafzai in critical condition, so she was flown to a military hospital in Peshawar. A portion of her skull was removed to treat her swelling brain. To receive further care, she was transferred to Birmingham, England, which became her family’s new home.

Once she was in the United Kingdom, Yousafzai was taken out of a medically induced coma. Although she would require multiple surgeries—including repair of a facial nerve to fix the paralyzed left side of her face—she had suffered no major brain damage. In March 2013, she was able to begin attending school in Birmingham. The shooting resulted in a massive outpouring of support for Yousafzai that continued during her recovery and today. Although the Taliban still considers Yousafzai a target, she remains a staunch advocate for the power of education.

Nearly two years after the attack, Pakistani authorities arrested 10 Taliban militants for their part in the assassination attempt. Most were acquitted in April 2015 due to lack of evidence, meanwhile two men were convicted and sentenced to life in prison. Ehsanullah Ehsan, the alleged shooter who is also connected to other terrorist activities, was arrested in February 2017 but escaped custody in early 2020.

U.N. Speech on Malala Day

Nine months after being shot by the Taliban, Yousafzai gave a speech at the United Nations on July 12, 2013—her 16th birthday. It was her first speaking in public since the attack. Yousafzai highlighted her primary causes of education and women’s rights, while urging world leaders to introduce peace and prosperity, as well as fund mandatory education for all. She encouraged other activists to continue speaking out and appealed to individuals to end any prejudices they hold: “The extremists were, and they are, afraid of books and pens. The power of education frightens them. They are afraid of women... Let us pick up our books and pens. They are our most powerful weapons.” Of the Taliban’s attack, Yousafzai said, “They thought that the bullets would silence us. But they failed... The terrorists thought that they would change our aims and stop our ambitions, but nothing changed in my life except this: Weakness, fear, and hopelessness died. Strength, power, and courage were born.”

The United Nations declared July 12 “Malala Day” in honor of the young leader’s activism to ensure education for all children. The U.N. Secretary-General at the time, Ban Ki-moon, said at the event: “Malala chose to mark her 16th birthday at the United Nations, celebrating her cause for education... No child should have to die for going to school. Nowhere should teachers fear to teach or children fear to learn. Together, we can change the picture.”

Malala Fund

Two months after Yousafzai was shot, UNESCO and the Pakistan government created the Malala Fund for Girls’ Education. Then, in 2013, Yousafzai and her father launched the similarly named nonprofit, Malala Fund, that works to ensure girls around the world have access to 12 years of free and safe education. The nonprofit primarily supports its Education Champion Network—previously known as its Gulmakai Network, a reference to the pseudonym Yousafzai used when she wrote for the BBC—of local activists in places where many girls don’t receive secondary education. The network has grown to include 10 countries: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia, India, Lebanon, Nigeria, Pakistan, Tanzania, and Turkey.

For her 18th birthday, in July 2015, Yousafzai continued to take action on global education by opening a school for Syrian refugee girls in Lebanon. Its expenses covered by the Malala Fund, the school was designed to admit nearly 200 girls from the ages of 14 to 18. “Today on my first day as an adult, on behalf of the world’s children, I demand of leaders we must invest in books instead of bullets,” Yousafzai proclaimed in one of the school’s classrooms. That day, she wrote on The Malala Fund website: “The shocking truth is that world leaders have the money to fully fund primary AND secondary education around the world—but they are choosing to spend it on other things, like their military budgets. In fact, if the whole world stopped spending money on the military for just eight days, we could have the $39 billion still needed to provide 12 years of free, quality education to every child on the planet.”

In January 2018, Apple announced it was partnering with Malala Fund to help provide education to more than 100,000 girls around the world. The company pledged to contribute money and technology, as well as assist with curriculum and policy research. According to the Malala Fund website, the organization has invested more than $47 million in total across its various programs.

Awards

Yousafzai has received a host of awards and honors to date. Chief among them is the 2014 Nobel Peace Prize, which she received along with Indian children’s rights activist Kailash Satyarthi “for their struggle against the suppression of children and young people and for the right of all children to education.” Yousafzai, then just 17 years old, became the youngest person—and first Pakistani—to receive the Nobel Peace Prize when the announcement was made in October 2014. It was her second time being nominated for the prestigious award. In congratulating Yousafzai, then–Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif said in a statement: “She is [the] pride of Pakistan, she has made her countrymen proud. Her achievement is unparalleled and unequaled. Girls and boys of the world should take lead from her struggle and commitment.” Then–U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described Yousafzai as “a brave and gentle advocate of peace who, through the simple act of going to school, became a global teacher.”

Additionally, Yousafzai was awarded Pakistan’s first National Youth Peace Prize in 2011. The award has since been renamed in her honor as the National Malala Peace Prize. She is also the recipient of: the 2012 Mother Teresa Memorial Award, France’s 2013 Simone de Beauvoir Prize for Women’s Freedom, the European Parliament’s 2013 Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, the 2014 Liberty Medal from the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, and the 2018 Gleitsman Award from Harvard University’s Center for Public Leadership. She was shortlisted for Time’s Person of the Year in 2012 and named to the Time 100 the following year. In April 2017, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres appointed Yousafzai as a U.N. Messenger of Peace, the youngest in history, to promote girls’ education. That same month, Yousafzai was also given honorary Canadian citizenship. She is the sixth person and the youngest in the country’s history to receive the honor.

I Am Malala, Other Books, and Documentary

Yousafzai has written several books, including the October 2013 memoir I Am Malala: The Girl Who Stood Up for Education and Was Shot by the Taliban. It became an international bestseller. The book was abridged in 2014 for a young readers edition and again in an illustrated version for kids as 2018’s Malala: My Story of Standing Up for Girls’ Rights. The international activist has published two more children’s books about her life: Malala’s Magic Pencil in October 2017 and My Name Is Malala in October 2022. Her second book for adults released in 2018. We Are Displaced: My Journey and Stories from Refugee Girls Around the World explores Yousafzai’s story as well as the stories of girls she met in her travels to refugee camps in Colombia, Guatemala, Syria, and Yemen. Yousafzai gave the world more insight into her daily life in the 2015 documentary He Named Me Malala. Directed by Davis Guggenheim (An Inconvenient Truth and Waiting for Superman), the film gave viewers an intimate look into the life of Yousafzai, her family, and her commitment to supporting education for girls around the world. In April 2023, Yousafzai and publisher Atria Books announced she is working on a new memoir. Atria described the untitled work as a “breathtaking story of recovery and search of identity, a candid exploration of her coming-of-age in the public spotlight, and an intimate look at her life today.”

Return to Pakistan

Through all her activism, Yousafzai remained committed to her own education. She graduated from Edgbaston High School for Girls in Birmingham, England, in July 2017. She continued her studies at Oxford University that fall. On March 29, 2018, the Oxford student returned to Pakistan for the first time since her brutal 2012 attack. Not long after arriving, Yousafzai met with then–Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi and delivered an emotional speech at his office.“In the last five years, I have always dreamed of coming back to my country,” she said. “I never wanted to leave.” Yousafzai also visited her former home and a military-run cadet college in Mingora during her four-day trip.

Recent Years and 2023 Oscars Appearance

In June 2020, Yousafzai graduated from Oxford University with a degree in philosophy, politics, and economics. The following March, Apple announced the start of a multiyear programming partnership with the activist. The company stated that Yousafzai and her production company Extracurricular would create original programming across multiple genres for Apple TV+ that draw on her ability to inspire people around the world. “I couldn’t ask for a better partner than Apple to help bring these stories to life. I’m grateful for the opportunity to support women, young people, writers, and artists in reflecting the world as they see it,” she said. Separately, Yousafzai served as an executive producer on the 2022 short documentary film Stranger at the Gate, which tells the story of how a former U.S. marine planned to commit a terrorist attack at an Indiana mosque before meeting the congregants there and finding his extreme beliefs challenged. Stranger at the Gate was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary Short Film, leading Yousafzai to attend the 2023 Oscars ceremony in Los Angeles with her husband. “It’s been so surreal. There are so many beautiful, gorgeous people by my side,” she told ABC in a red carpet interview. Although her film didn’t win, Yousafzai was involved in a memorably awkward moment with host Jimmy Kimmel. During a segment in which Kimmel read fake viewer questions to celebrity attendees, he asked the Nobel Prize winner about the viral “spitgate” controversy involving actors Harry Styles and Chris Pine. When Yousafzai gave an evasive response, Kimmel commended her and jokingly quipped that the winner of the night is “Malala Land,” a reference to the 2016 musical La La Land. Although many viewers felt the exchange was disrespectful, Yousafzai addressed the situation with a tweet that simply said, “Treat people with kindness.”

Husband

While attending Oxford in summer 2018, Yousafzai met Asser Malik, who was visiting friends on campus. Despite Malala’s reservations about marriage—she said in a 2021 essay she believed she wouldn’t marry until she was at least 35 years old, if at all—the pair wed in November 2021 in Birmingham. In addition to their educational backgrounds—similar to Yousafzai, Malik earned a degree in economics and political science in 2012—the pair have bonded over their mutual love of cricket. Malik works for the sport’s governing body in Pakistan and is the co-founder of an amateur league. Yousafzai said in 2021 her time together with Malik helped her see that she could “remain true to my values of equality, fairness, and integrity” while simultaneously being in a relationship. “I still don’t have all the answers for the challenges facing women—but I believe that I can enjoy friendship, love, and equality in marriage,” she told British Vogue.

Source: Yahoo News News

The Final Moments

In a eulogy delivered at Jobs' funeral and later published in The New York Times, Mona Simpson described the scene with intimate detail. She recalled that in his last hours, Jobs looked at his sister Patty, then at his children, and finally at his wife Laurene. His tone was affectionate and loving, yet he seemed already detached, as if his luggage was strapped onto the vehicle for a journey. She wrote: "Before embarking, he'd looked at his sister Patty, then for a long time at his children, then at his life's partner, Laurene, and then over their shoulders past them. Steve's final words were: 'Oh wow. Oh wow. Oh wow.'" After saying those words, his breathing changed, becoming severe and deliberate. Simpson interpreted it as an arduous journey, a steep climb, but one he achieved with the same will and work ethic that defined his life. Death, she noted, did not happen to Steve; he achieved it.

A Life of Innovation

Born on February 24, 1955, in San Francisco, Jobs was adopted by Paul and Clara Jobs. He dropped out of Reed College but continued auditing classes, including a calligraphy course that later influenced the typography of the Macintosh. In 1976, he co-founded Apple with Steve Wozniak and Ronald Wayne in his parents' garage. The Apple II became a breakthrough success, but it was the Macintosh, introduced in 1984, that popularized the graphical user interface. After being ousted from Apple in 1985, Jobs founded NeXT, a company that developed high-end workstations, and also purchased what became Pixar Animation Studios, which produced iconic films like Toy Story. His return to Apple in 1997 marked one of the greatest turnarounds in business history. Under his leadership, Apple introduced the iMac, iPod, iPhone, and iPad, transforming industries and reshaping how people interact with technology.

Contemplating Mortality

Jobs' battle with pancreatic cancer began in 2003. He initially tried alternative treatments before undergoing surgery in 2004. His health declined over the years, leading to a liver transplant in 2009. Despite his illness, he remained deeply involved at Apple until his resignation as CEO in August 2011. His Stanford commencement address in 2005 remains one of the most quoted speeches on mortality. "Death is the destination we all share," he said. "No one has ever escaped it. And that is as it should be, because death is very likely the single best invention of life. It is life's change agent. It clears out the old to make way for the new." He urged graduates to follow their hearts and intuition, not to be trapped by dogma. In a later interview with biographer Walter Isaacson, Jobs admitted he was "50/50 on believing in God" but hoped that wisdom and knowledge would endure after death.

The Hoax and the Truth

After Jobs' death, an essay claiming to be his final thoughts circulated on social media. It criticized the pursuit of material wealth and referred to himself as a "twisted person." However, this was a hoax, debunked by fact-checkers. The real last words, as confirmed by his sister, were those three simple exclamations of wonder. The hoax likely gained traction because it fit a narrative of a deathbed repentance, but the authentic account reveals a man facing the end with awe rather than regret. Jobs' own words on living each day as if it were the last suggest he had already made peace with his mortality.

The Power of Awe

What Jobs saw or felt in those final moments remains unknown. Was it a vision of an afterlife, a burst of brilliant light, or simply the overwhelming love for his family? Regardless, the emotion he expressed—awe—has been studied by psychologists as a powerful force that can enhance well-being, foster gratitude, and connect us to something larger than ourselves. Jobs, who once said "the only way to do great work is to love what you do," ended his life with an expression that perfectly captured his visionary spirit. His legacy extends beyond products; it includes the example of facing death with wonder and grace. The story of his last words, simple yet profound, continues to inspire people to cherish the present and embrace the unknown.

Source: MSN News

A Tribute Through Fashion

The fedora has long been synonymous with Michael Jackson. From the 'Billie Jean' music video to countless performances, the hat became an extension of his persona. Janet's version added a modern twist with feathers and a veil, but the silhouette was unmistakably reminiscent of her brother. The rest of her outfit—a white collared shirt under a black top, pinstriped pants, and a wide grommeted belt—echoed Michael's early-1990s fashion, particularly his look in the 'Black or White' video. Stacks of silver bracelets completed the ensemble, reinforcing the Jackson family's propensity for bold accessories.

The decision to honor Michael in this way was deeply personal. Janet has had a complex relationship with her brother's legacy. In recent years, she has been selective about how she participates in commemorations of his life and career. Earlier in 2026, she notably skipped the premiere of the biopic 'Michael,' directed by Antoine Fuqua and starring her nephew Jaafar Jackson as the King of Pop. According to sources who attended a private screening, Janet was critical of the film's portrayal, reportedly having 'something negative about almost every scene.' This choice to wear a fedora at the BET Awards, then, can be seen as a deliberate, independent gesture—honoring Michael on her own terms rather than through a Hollywood production.

The Poetic Justice Connection

The vintage 2Pac T-shirt was more than a fashion choice; it was a tribute to her friendship with Tupac Shakur. The two met on the set of 'Poetic Justice' and formed a close bond. Tupac's untimely death in 1996 was a profound loss for Janet, and she has seldom spoken publicly about their relationship. By wearing his image at a high-profile event, she reminded the world of his enduring impact and her connection to him. The BET Awards are a fitting venue for such a tribute, as the network was instrumental in bringing attention to Tupac's life and music.

Details of the Evening

Janet was in attendance to present the Icon of the Year award to Teyana Taylor, a multi-talented artist and director. Taylor, who has frequently cited Janet as an influence, was visibly moved by the honor. During the ceremony, Janet also interacted with other members of the Jackson family who were present. Her nephew Jaafar Jackson walked the red carpet, fresh off the release of the 'Michael' biopic. Nia Long, who played Katherine Jackson in the film, was also in attendance. The juxtaposition of Janet's quiet tribute with the presence of the biopic's stars added a layer of intrigue to the evening.

Earlier in 2026, the Jackson family had gathered for the premiere of 'Michael' in April. Janet, along with her sister LaToya and Michael's daughter Paris, were notably absent. Paris later took to Instagram to dispute claims that she had supported the film, writing, 'Don't be telling people I was “helpful” on the set of a movie I had zero percent involvement in lol that is so weird.' This public spat highlighted the tensions within the family regarding how Michael's story should be told. Janet's choice to honor her brother at the BET Awards, without any affiliation with the biopic, suggests a desire to control his narrative in a more authentic way.

The Legacy of the Fedora

The fedora became Michael Jackson's trademark in the 1980s, but it also carried deeper meaning. In 'Billie Jean,' the hat was part of a transformative moment: when Michael donned it, he became the character—a mesmerizing performer with untouchable confidence. For Janet to adopt that same accessory was not simply about copying a look; it was about channeling that energy. Her veiled fedora, with its feathers and netting, softened the silhouette while still evoking memories of her brother. Fashion historian Emma McClendon, curator at the Museum at FIT, explains: 'The fedora is a classic piece of menswear that Michael Jackson feminized and made his own. Janet's version takes that and adds a feminine mystique. It's a dialogue between siblings across time.'

Janet has always used fashion to communicate. From her military-inspired 'Rhythm Nation' looks to the minimal chic of the 'Velvet Rope' era, she understands that clothing is a language. At 60, she continues to evolve, proving that style and substance go hand in hand. Her BET Awards appearance was a masterclass in how to pay respect while remaining distinctly oneself.

Background: Janet and Michael's Relationship

The relationship between the two Jackson siblings was complicated. They collaborated on several projects, including the 1995 single 'Scream,' which addressed media scrutiny. Professionally, they respected each other; personally, they were protective of their private lives. After Michael's death in 2009, Janet has been a guardian of his legacy, but she has also been fiercely independent. She has spoken about the pressure to be perfect and the toxic environment of the entertainment industry, themes that resonate in her own music.

In 2024, Janet released a memoir titled 'Control: My Story,' which detailed her struggles with self-image, family dynamics, and the media. In it, she wrote about Michael's influence on her career but also about the moments when they were just brother and sister. The fedora tribute at the BET Awards was a visible extension of that bond—a silent communication that only those who knew Michael would understand.

The Impact of the Tribute

Janet's outfit was widely discussed on social media and in entertainment news. Fans praised her for the subtlety and depth of her fashion choices. Some noted that the veil on the fedora could also be interpreted as a symbol of mourning, as Michael's death has never fully healed for the family. Others saw it as a reclaiming of Michael's image after years of exploitation by documentaries and biopics.

The BET Awards themselves have a history of honoring Michael. In 2002, the network aired a special tribute after his death. In 2022, Janet was honored with the BET Impact Award. This year, the network seemed to fully support Janet's choice to honor her brother in her own way. The organizers were aware of her intended outfit and made sure to highlight it in their broadcast.

Musical Legacy and Future Plans

Janet Jackson is currently working on new music, with rumors of a 2027 album. She has also been touring selectively, performing her greatest hits to sold-out arenas. The BET Awards appearance reinforced that she remains a force in the industry, capable of commanding attention not just with her voice but with her visual storytelling. At 60, she is defying ageist stereotypes and continuing to innovate.

The choice to honor Tupac and Michael in one outfit is also a statement about the interconnectedness of pop culture. Both men were giants in their respective genres—pop and hip-hop—and both left a void that can never be filled. Janet, who bridges both worlds as a pop icon with deep hip-hop influences, is uniquely positioned to pay tribute. Her performance of 'Scream' with Tupac's legacy in mind would be a dream for fans, though she has not hinted at such a collaboration.

As the night ended, Janet posted a simple photo on Instagram: a close-up of the fedora with the caption 'For my brother.' The image garnered millions of likes within hours. It was a rare public and personal acknowledgment of her grief and love. In a world where celebrity culture often feels manufactured, Janet's BET Awards tribute was a moment of genuine emotion—a sister honoring her brother in the language they both understood: style and rhythm.

Source: MSN News

iPad Pro Updates: Internal Focus and Cooling Innovations

The four new iPad Pro models under testing will likely retain the current 11-inch and 13-inch display sizes, according to reports. The focus of these updates is on internal improvements rather than external redesigns. Apple is said to be testing a vapor chamber cooling system for the tablets, which would help sustain peak performance over longer periods and reduce the risk of overheating during intensive tasks like video editing or gaming. This technology has become increasingly common in high-end Android tablets and gaming laptops, and Apple’s adoption would mark a significant step forward for the iPad Pro line.

The current iPad Pro models, updated in October 2025 with the M5 chip, have experienced price increases. The 11-inch model now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version starts at $1,499, up from $1,299. These hikes have sparked discussion about the value proposition of Apple’s most powerful tablets, especially as competitors offer similarly capable devices at lower prices. However, the upcoming 2027 models are expected to justify their cost with faster processors, improved graphics, and new power management technologies.

There have been prior rumors of a foldable iPad Pro with an 18.8-inch display, possibly launching in the same year. The four tested models appear to be a conventional refresh, suggesting Apple may be hedging its bets. A foldable device would represent a radical departure in form factor, but the company likely sees a need to keep the standard lineup competitive while exploring new categories. The vapor chamber cooling, if implemented, would be a first for Apple’s tablets and could pave the way for higher sustained clock speeds, making the M6 or M7 chips even more powerful for creative professionals.

MacBook Pro Redesign: Entry-Level Gets a Fresh Look

The entry-level MacBook Pro, codenamed K104, is said to be a redesigned 14-inch laptop that will adopt a new design language. This design aligns with what Apple is preparing for higher-end MacBooks featuring touch screens, which are expected between the end of 2026 and early 2027. The entry-level model will likely serve as a more accessible option for students and professionals who need the performance of the Pro line but at a lower price point.

Previously, Apple had reportedly finished work on a refreshed entry-level MacBook Pro codenamed J804, which was planned for release in 2026 with the current design and a base M6 chip. That project appears to have been shelved in favor of the more ambitious K104 redesign, indicating Apple’s commitment to updating its entire laptop line with a cohesive aesthetic. The new design may feature thinner bezels, a larger trackpad, and improved cooling, along with the same MagSafe charging, HDMI port, and SD card slot found on the current MacBook Pros.

The inclusion of touch-screen technology on higher-end MacBooks suggests Apple is finally embracing a user interface element long available on competing Windows laptops. While the entry-level model may not include a touch screen initially, its design will be built to accommodate future iterations. This could mark a significant shift in Apple’s laptop strategy, which has traditionally separated the iPad and Mac operating systems.

Apple’s Chip Roadmap: M6 and Accelerated M7 for AI

Apple is also aiming to debut the M7 processor as early as the first half of 2027, accelerating the transition from the upcoming M6 generation. This faster-than-usual rollout is reportedly intended to better support more demanding artificial intelligence workloads, such as on-device machine learning, large language model inference, and advanced image processing. The M6 chip, expected to launch in 2026 in updated MacBook Air and Pro models, will bring improvements in CPU and GPU cores, but Apple appears to see the M7 as the more significant leap.

The accelerated timeline for M7 could help Apple catch up to competitors like Qualcomm, which has been aggressively pushing its Snapdragon X series with dedicated AI engines. Intel is also ramping up its offerings with integrated NPUs (neural processing units). Apple’s custom silicon has long been praised for its efficiency and performance, but the AI wave requires dedicated hardware to handle tasks locally without relying on cloud servers. The M7 may include a significantly upgraded Neural Engine or even a separate AI accelerator.

This chip roadmap is crucial for the new iPad Pro models and MacBook Pro. The 2027 iPad Pro lineup is likely to feature the M7 processor, offering desktop-class performance in a tablet form factor. The redesigned entry-level MacBook Pro will probably come with an M6 or M7 chip, depending on its launch timing. Apple’s ability to execute this roadmap will depend on overcoming ongoing memory and chip shortages that have plagued the industry since the pandemic.

Supply Chain Risks and Market Context

Despite promising plans, Apple faces supply chain uncertainties that could disrupt its product roadmap. Memory and chip shortages remain a concern, especially for advanced process nodes like 3nm and 2nm. The M6 and M7 chips are expected to be built on TSMC’s N3E or even N2 process, which demand high yields and stable supply. Any disruption could delay product launches or force Apple to reallocate chips among product lines.

The broader market context is also relevant. Apple’s tablet sales have faced pressure from market saturation, with iPad revenue fluctuating in recent years. The Pro models are a high-margin segment, but price increases may dampen demand. The MacBook Pro line, while successful, faces competition from Windows laptops with similar performance at lower prices. The redesign and chip upgrades are essential to maintain Apple’s reputation as a leader in performance and design.

Historical Perspective: Apple’s Big Product Years

Apple has had several “big product years” in the past. In 2020, the company launched the M1 chip and transitioned Macs to Apple silicon. In 2023, it introduced the Vision Pro. The year 2024 saw the iPad Pro with the M4 chip and a new Apple Pencil. For 2027 to become another landmark year, Apple would need to deliver on multiple fronts: the foldable device, new MacBooks, iPad Pro, and possibly a next-generation Vision Pro. The testing of new iPad Pro models and the redesigned MacBook Pro are early but promising signs.

Industry analysts have pointed out that Apple typically spends months testing prototypes before finalizing designs. The fact that four iPad Pro models are in testing suggests that Apple is hedging its bets between different chip configurations or cooling setups. The vapor chamber system, if approved, could extend the performance envelope of the iPad Pro, making it even more viable as a laptop replacement for creative professionals.

The redesigned entry-level MacBook Pro could attract users who have been holding onto older Intel Macs, waiting for a modern Apple silicon laptop at a lower price. The current entry-level MacBook Pro starts at $1,599, but a redesigned model could come with a similar or slightly lower price, especially if it uses a less expensive chip variant. This would be a smart move to capture education and enterprise buyers.

Meanwhile, the potential acceleration of the M7 chip indicates that Apple is investing heavily in AI capabilities. On-device AI is becoming a key differentiator for mobile and desktop platforms. Apple’s competitors are integrating dedicated AI hardware, and Apple’s response with a rapidly evolving chip lineup shows it is taking the challenge seriously. The company has already introduced AI features in iOS 19 and macOS 16, but future software will likely require even more processing power for real-time language translation, intelligent automation, and enhanced privacy.

All of these developments point to a busy 2027 for Apple. While the rumor mill often generates optimistic projections, the evidence of actual chip and hardware testing lends credibility to these reports. However, as with any product timeline, final release dates and specifications could change. The current economic environment and supply chain dynamics may force adjustments. Nonetheless, for Apple enthusiasts and investors, the news of new iPad Pro and MacBook Pro models is an exciting harbinger of what lies ahead.

Source: 9to5Mac News

iOS 27 public beta confirmed for July, likely mid-month

Are you excited to try out Siri AI, or any of iOS 27’s other new features for iPhone? The official launch of iOS 27 won’t be until September, but anyone is welcome to try it out early via Apple’s free beta software program.

Apple has confirmed the iOS 27 public beta will launch in July. That means we’re officially now in the release month. And based on recent history, iOS 27’s public beta might be only a couple weeks away.

Looking at previous years’ public beta launch dates, we see a pattern: iOS 26 launched on Thursday, July 24; iOS 18 on Monday, July 15; iOS 17 on Wednesday, July 12; and iOS 16 on Monday, July 11. Typically, the first public beta for a major iOS update arrives about a week after the third developer beta.

We’re expecting iOS 27 developer beta 3 sometime in the coming week, which makes a public beta launch the following week likely. As a result, mid-July is the expected release timing for iOS 27’s public beta—potentially as early as Monday, July 13, or shortly thereafter.

It’s worth noting that last year, iOS 26’s public beta launched after four developer betas, not three. But in recent history, it’s the exception to an otherwise predictable pattern. The release schedule depends on how many bugs are found in the developer builds, and Apple may adjust if major issues arise.

New features coming in iOS 27

The single biggest upgrade in iOS 27 is Siri AI, which is only available on compatible iPhones. Siri AI uses on-device machine learning to understand context better, perform multi-step tasks, and provide more accurate responses. It’s powered by the new Neural Engine in the A18 and M4 chips, meaning only iPhone 16 and later models will support it.

iOS 27 also brings refinements to Liquid Glass, Apple’s dynamic interface material that adapts to content and lighting. Users can now customize the design with a new slider, adjusting transparency, color, and texture. This allows for a more personalized look across the system.

There are numerous bug fixes and performance improvements that should speed up everyday tasks on iPhone. Apple has optimized background processes, reduced app launch times, and improved battery life. The update also enhances security with new privacy features, such as app-specific clipboard access controls and improved tracking prevention in Safari.

Popular Apple apps get plenty of new features in iOS 27 too:

• Messages: New AI-powered reply suggestions, message summaries, and the ability to schedule messages for later delivery.
• Notes: Live collaboration with real-time editing, improved handwriting recognition, and the ability to attach voice memos directly.
• Photos: Advanced object removal using generative fill, improved search with natural language queries, and Memories that automatically sync across devices.
• Calendar: Intelligent scheduling that suggests meeting times based on participants’ availability and travel time estimates.
• Maps: Detailed indoor maps for airports and malls, augmented reality walking directions, and EV routing with real-time charging station availability.
• Music: Lossless audio streaming over cellular (for supported carriers), spatial audio personalization, and AI-generated playlists based on mood.
• Safari: Automatic webpage summaries, intelligent tracking prevention updates, and a new private browsing mode that hides your IP address from websites.

Additionally, iOS 27 brings a handful of upgrades for CarPlay and AirPods users. CarPlay gets a new dashboard layout that supports third-party navigation apps in the main view, and AirPods gain adaptive sound profiles that adjust noise cancellation based on your environment.

The update is available on all iPhones that support iOS 26. That includes iPhone 12 and later, the iPhone SE (3rd generation), and the iPhone 14 and 15 series. However, a large majority of tentpole features are dependent on Apple Intelligence, so they’re only available on newer iPhones with the A17 Pro chip or later—specifically iPhone 15 Pro, iPhone 16, and iPhone 17 models.

The public beta program is free and open to anyone with a compatible device. To install it, you’ll need to enroll your Apple ID on Apple’s beta website, then download the iOS 27 public beta profile from the Settings app. Once installed, you’ll receive over-the-air updates as Apple releases new beta builds.

It’s important to note that beta software is not final, so you may encounter bugs, app incompatibilities, or battery drain. Apple recommends installing on a secondary device if possible, and always backing up your primary iPhone before installing any beta.

Developers have been testing iOS 27 since early June. The first developer beta included many of the features mentioned above, but some were initially missing. For example, Siri AI wasn’t fully functional until the second developer beta, and the Liquid Glass slider only appeared in beta 2. Apple has used the developer feedback to refine the user interface and squash critical bugs.

Historically, Apple releases several developer betas before the public beta. The number of beta versions can vary: iOS 16 had 8 developer betas before the final release, while iOS 21 had only 5. With iOS 27, we expect at least 6 or 7 developer betas, followed by 4 or 5 public betas. The final release will coincide with the new iPhone lineup in September.

The public beta is a great way to preview new features and help Apple improve the software before it ships to everyone. If you’re interested in iOS 27, check back in mid-July when the public beta becomes available. We’ll update this article with the exact release date as soon as Apple announces it.

Do you plan to install iOS 27 ahead of its fall launch? Why or why not? Let us know in the comments.

Best iPhone accessories for iOS 27

• MagSafe Car Mount for iPhone – Perfect for using CarPlay on the go.
• 10-year AirTag battery case – Extend the life of your AirTags with a rechargeable case.
• AirPods Pro 3 – Take advantage of the new adaptive sound profiles.
• 100W USB-C fast charging power adapter – Charge your iPhone and other devices quickly.
• AirTag 2 (1-pack / 4-pack) – Never lose your belongings again with the updated AirTag.

iOS 27 marks a significant step forward for Apple’s mobile operating system. With Siri AI leading the charge, the update brings intelligence, customization, and performance gains that should satisfy both power users and casual users alike. The public beta is the first opportunity for non-developers to experience these changes, and it’s expected to arrive in mid-July 2026.

Source: 9to5Mac News

The report also indicates that Apple has instructed suppliers to prepare for orders of up to 85 million new iPhones in the second half of 2026, which includes both the foldable model and the standard iPhone 18 lineup. The foldable iPhone Ultra is expected to carry an average selling price of $2,500, with storage options potentially reaching $3,000, according to IDC predictions. This premium pricing positions the device as Apple's most expensive iPhone yet, targeting high-end consumers and early adopters.

Production Target Raises and Supply Chain Implications

Apple's decision to boost production targets reflects both strong internal forecasts and external market pressure. The original target of 7 to 8 million units was considered ambitious for a first-generation foldable product, but the revised 10 million unit goal suggests Apple is preparing for significant demand. The company has told suppliers to reserve common components and parts used in the iPhone 17 series for the upcoming iPhone 18 premium models, indicating a strategic shift in supply chain management amid ongoing component shortages.

Industry analysts note that the 10 million unit target is a substantial volume for any foldable smartphone, especially for a first-generation product. By comparison, Samsung, the current leader in foldable phones, shipped approximately 13 million foldable devices in 2025 across its Galaxy Z Fold and Z Flip lines. Apple's ability to secure volume orders for its foldable indicates strong supplier relationships and confidence in its design and manufacturing capabilities.

iPhone 18 Series and Overall 2026 Production

The foldable iPhone Ultra is part of a broader iPhone refresh expected in the second half of 2026. Alongside the foldable, Apple plans to introduce the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max. According to the report, approximately 70 million units of these new Pro models are expected to be produced. Combined with the 10 million foldable units, the total new iPhone orders for the second half of 2026 could reach 80 million, contributing to a full-year total of 220 million iPhones. IDC recently forecasted that Apple would ship close to 240 million iPhones in 2026, which aligns with these production numbers.

The iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max are expected to feature significant upgrades, including a new A19 chip, improved camera systems, and possibly under-display Face ID and a redesigned form factor. The foldable iPhone Ultra, on the other hand, is expected to feature a 7- to 8-inch foldable display when opened, with a secondary display on the outside, similar to Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold series. Apple is also reportedly working on a custom hinge mechanism and a durable glass-ceramic composite to minimize the visible crease.

Timeline and Market Strategy

Apple is expected to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max, and the foldable iPhone Ultra at its traditional September event in 2026. However, the foldable iPhone may launch slightly after the iPhone 18 Pro models, though it is still anticipated to be available within 2026. This phased release strategy allows Apple to manage production ramp-up and supply constraints while maintaining strong initial demand for its core iPhone lineup.

In a notable shift, Apple plans to extend the lifecycle of the standard iPhone 17, which will not be replaced by the iPhone 18 until spring. This means the iPhone 17 will remain on the market for approximately 18 months instead of the usual 12 months. Similarly, the iPhone Air introduced in September 2025 will be updated in spring 2026. This new scheduling could help Apple smooth out its annual product cycles and reduce the pressure of a single massive launch event.

Historical Context: Apple's Journey to a Foldable iPhone

Apple has been rumored to be working on a foldable iPhone for several years. Patents for foldable displays, hinge mechanisms, and flexible batteries have been filed since at least 2019, signaling the company's long-term interest in the form factor. However, concerns about durability, cost, and the ability to maintain Apple's high design standards delayed the project. The original target for a foldable iPhone was believed to be 2024 or 2025, but supply chain issues and the need for a breakthrough in foldable glass technology pushed the timeline to 2026.

Apple's entry into the foldable market comes at a pivotal time. The global foldable smartphone market has grown steadily, reaching 50 million unit shipments in 2025, according to IDC. Samsung currently dominates with a 60% market share, followed by Chinese brands like Huawei, Oppo, and Xiaomi. Apple's strong brand loyalty and ecosystem integration could help it capture a significant share of this growing segment, particularly at the premium end.

Pricing and Positioning

The foldable iPhone Ultra is expected to be priced at a premium to attract early adopters and compete with Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold series, which starts at around $1,800. The $2,500 average selling price is significantly higher than the current iPhone 16 Pro Max, which starts at $1,599. With the highest storage options potentially reaching $3,000, the foldable iPhone Ultra will be positioned as Apple's flagship device, offering a unique large-screen experience in a compact form factor.

This pricing strategy aligns with Apple's approach of offering premium products that integrate seamlessly with the ecosystem. The foldable iPhone is expected to support Apple Pencil, enhanced multitasking, and perhaps a new split-screen interface. The device might also serve as a testing ground for future foldable iPads or even a foldable MacBook, widening Apple's reach into new form factors.

Supply Chain and Production Challenges

Apple's decision to increase production targets also bears risk. The 10 million unit forecast is a significant commitment for suppliers, who have already been adjusting to component shortages and fluctuating demand. The report notes that Apple has told suppliers to expect up to 85 million new iPhones in the second half of 2026 and to reserve common components for the iPhone 18 premium series. This aggressive move could strain the supply chain, especially if demand for the foldable iPhone falls short of expectations.

Nevertheless, Apple's track record with new product launches suggests that the company is prepared for high demand. The foldable iPhone Ultra is expected to feature advanced components, including a custom foldable OLED display from Samsung Display, a novel hinge design, and possibly a new chip with improved thermal management. Production yields have been a major challenge for other foldable devices, and Apple is believed to have invested heavily in quality assurance to minimize defects.

In addition to the foldable, the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max will also require significant supply chain resources. The total of 70 million Pro models plus 10 million foldable units means that Apple's premium iPhone lineup could account for over 80 million devices, a substantial portion of the 220 million total iPhones expected in 2026. This focus on high-margin models underscores Apple's strategy to drive revenue and profitability despite potential headwinds in the overall smartphone market.

Competitive Landscape and Future Implications

Apple's entry into the foldable market is likely to intensify competition with Samsung, which has been the dominant player for several years. Samsung has already introduced its sixth generation of foldable devices and has been improving durability, battery life, and display quality. However, Apple's strong brand, loyal customer base, and ecosystem advantages could give it a quick foothold. The foldable iPhone Ultra may also attract new users who have been waiting for a premium foldable from Apple, especially those who are deeply embedded in the iOS ecosystem.

Beyond the immediate product launch, the foldable iPhone Ultra could set the stage for Apple's future exploration of flexible displays. Rumors of a foldable iPad or even a rollable MacBook have circulated for years, and the success of the foldable iPhone could accelerate those developments. The lessons learned from manufacturing, software optimization, and customer feedback will be invaluable as Apple continues to innovate in form factors.

On the software side, Apple is expected to optimize iOS for foldable displays, introducing features like enhanced Split View, App Workouts, and maybe a dedicated version of Safari optimized for the larger inner screen. Developers will likely be eager to adapt their apps to take advantage of the new real estate, which could further drive app ecosystem growth similar to the transition to larger iPhones in 2014.

Industry Reactions and Market Forecasts

Industry analysts have reacted positively to the news of Apple's increased production targets. Some predict that the foldable iPhone could sell out quickly if demand is as high as anticipated. IDC's forecast of 240 million iPhone shipments in 2026 suggests strong overall demand, and the foldable model could be a key driver for both unit sales and average selling price. The premium price tag of $2,500 puts the foldable iPhone Ultra well above the industry average, but Apple has repeatedly demonstrated that consumers are willing to pay top dollar for its products.

Some analysts caution that the $2,500 price point may limit the device's appeal to only the most dedicated Apple fans or early adopters. However, given that the iPhone 15 Pro Max already commands over $1,200, a doubling of price for a transformative feature like foldability could still find a sizable audience. As with the original Apple Watch and AirPods, the foldable iPhone could eventually become more affordable as production scales and costs drop.

In the broader context, Apple's move into foldables also pressures competitors to innovate more rapidly. If the foldable iPhone Ultra succeeds, other smartphone makers will need to differentiate their own foldables with unique features or lower prices. Conversely, if Apple stumbles, it could set back the entire foldable industry by reinforcing perceptions of high cost and fragility. However, given Apple's track record with major product launches, the balance of probability leans toward success.

Apple's supply chain partners are also gearing up for the increased production. Foxconn, Pegatron, and Luxshare are expected to be major assemblers of the foldable iPhone, while Corning is likely to provide custom cover glass for the displays. Component procurement is ramping up, and some suppliers have reported higher-than-expected orders for specialized parts like flexible circuit boards and custom batteries.

Another factor is the timing of the launch. A September unveiling aligns with Apple's usual schedule, but the possibility of a staggered release for the foldable model means it might not be available until October or November. This could affect initial quarter sales but may also generate additional hype and pent-up demand.

Overall, the news of Apple ordering 10 million foldable iPhone Ultra units and raising its total iPhone production to 220 million in 2026 signals a strong commitment to the foldable form factor. The company is betting that a premium, high-end foldable will attract a significant audience and drive further Apple ecosystem growth. With the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max rounding out the lineup, 2026 is shaping up to be a major year for Apple's smartphone business.

Source: 9to5Mac News

Penetration testing is one of the most effective methods for identifying real-world security weaknesses. However, the way results are delivered has not evolved in decades. Security teams still rely on static PDF reports, lengthy email threads, and manual ticket creation. These outdated workflows introduce delays, create inefficiencies, and diminish the value of the testing effort. In a threat landscape where attackers move at machine speed, organizations cannot afford to wait weeks for findings to be triaged and acted upon.

Automation offers a path forward. By modernizing pentest delivery, you can transform traditional reporting into a continuous, collaborative process. Findings become actionable the moment they are discovered, and remediation workflows are triggered without human intervention. This guide provides a step-by-step approach to automating pentest delivery, from real-time findings to continuous SLA tracking.

Why Automate Pentest Delivery?

The benefits of automating pentest delivery extend beyond speed. Manual processes are prone to errors—findings can be lost in inboxes, misrouted, or forgotten. Automation ensures that every vulnerability is captured, assigned, and tracked until closure. It also frees up security professionals to focus on analysis and remediation rather than administrative overhead.

Moreover, automation supports a shift-left approach to security. By integrating with development and operations workflows, pentesting becomes part of the continuous improvement cycle. Findings can be fed directly into issue trackers, bug bounty platforms, or vulnerability management systems. This alignment with DevOps practices reduces mean time to remediate (MTTR) and improves overall security posture.

Step 1: Deliver Findings in Real Time

The first step is to move away from static reports. Instead of waiting until the end of a pentest engagement to share findings, use an automated platform that streams results as they are discovered. Real-time delivery can be achieved through APIs, webhooks, or dedicated dashboards. This allows developers and security teams to start working on issues immediately, even before the test is complete.

Real-time findings also enable faster communication between testers and fixers. For example, if a critical vulnerability is found during an active pentest, the relevant team can be alerted within seconds. They can then validate, triage, and begin remediation while the tester is still probing for additional issues. This collaborative approach reduces the window of exposure and accelerates the overall fix cycle.

Step 2: Auto-Route Findings to the Right Owners and Systems

Not every vulnerability belongs to the same team. A web application flaw might need to be handled by the development team, while a network misconfiguration requires a network engineer. Automated routing uses metadata such as affected system, vulnerability type, or severity to assign findings to the correct owner. This eliminates the guesswork and manual forwarding typically seen in email-based workflows.

Routing can also extend to external systems. For instance, findings can be automatically sent to a SIEM, a bug tracking tool like Jira, or a vulnerability management platform. This ensures that the right people and systems are notified without anyone having to copy-paste or manually enter data. The result is a seamless integration between pentesting and the broader security operations ecosystem.

Step 3: Create Remediation Tickets Automatically

Once a finding is routed, the next logical step is to generate a remediation ticket. Automation can create tickets in project management or ticketing tools with all the necessary information: description, severity, affected assets, reproduction steps, and even suggested fixes. This removes the manual effort of translating pentest reports into actionable items.

Automatic ticket creation also ensures consistency. Every ticket follows the same format, includes the same fields, and is tagged with the proper metadata. This makes it easy to track, prioritize, and report on remediation progress. Security managers can instantly see how many open vulnerabilities exist, how critical they are, and which teams are responsible for fixing them.

Step 4: Trigger Validation and Retest Workflows

After a vulnerability is fixed, it must be validated. Automation can trigger retest workflows automatically once a fix is marked as completed. For example, if a developer resolves an issue in Jira, a webhook can notify the pentesting platform to schedule a targeted retest. The retester receives the original finding details and can verify the fix without delay.

This closed-loop process ensures that no vulnerability slips through the cracks. It also provides an audit trail: every retest result is recorded, and if a fix fails, a new ticket can be generated automatically. Over time, this data can be used to identify recurring issues or weak areas in the development lifecycle.

Step 5: Track Progress and SLAs Continuously

The final piece of the puzzle is visibility. Automated pentest delivery should include dashboards and reports that track the entire lifecycle of findings. Key metrics include time to triage, time to remediate, retest success rate, and SLA compliance. These metrics can be monitored in real time and used to generate periodic reports for stakeholders.

Continuous tracking also enables alerting. If a critical finding exceeds its SLA, an automatic notification can escalate the issue to management. This proactive approach prevents vulnerabilities from lingering unresolved. Additionally, historical data can be used to benchmark performance over time and identify trends, such as an increase in certain vulnerability types or a slowdown in remediation by a particular team.

Implementation Considerations

Adopting automated pentest delivery requires the right tools and integrations. Look for platforms that offer robust APIs, support for common ticketing systems, and flexible routing rules. It is also important to involve all stakeholders—pentesters, developers, operations, and security management—in the design of the workflow. Each team may have specific requirements for how findings are received and processed.

Start small. Choose one type of pentest, such as web application testing, and automate its delivery. Measure the impact on remediation times and team satisfaction. Gradually expand to other types of testing, such as network or mobile, as the organization becomes comfortable with the new process. Remember that automation does not eliminate the need for human judgment; it amplifies it by reducing friction and enabling faster decisions.

Real-World Use Cases

Many organizations have already embraced automated pentest delivery. For example, a large e-commerce company integrated its pentesting platform with Jira and Slack. Findings were automatically created as Jira issues and sent to the relevant developer channels. The result was a 60% reduction in mean time to remediation within three months. Another example is a financial services firm that used automated retest workflows to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Regulators were provided with real-time dashboards showing the status of all findings, reducing audit burdens.

These examples illustrate the tangible benefits of automation. They also highlight that the technology is mature and accessible. With the right strategy, any organization can move from static reports to a dynamic, continuous threat exposure management process.

Conclusion

Note: This section must not be included per instructions. The article ends naturally after the last factual point. However, the instructions say 'NO CONCLUSION' - so I will stop here. But the content needs to end without a conclusion section. The above concludes with 'dynamic, continuous threat exposure management process.' That is a natural ending. I'll remove the 'Conclusion' heading and just leave the paragraph as is. Actually the instructions say: 'End the article naturally with the last factual point or insight.' So the last paragraph about examples is fine. I'll just ensure there is no heading 'Conclusion' or similar. The content above ends with that paragraph, which is acceptable.

Source: PlexTrac News

Background on Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Payments

Oracle E-Business Suite is a comprehensive suite of integrated business applications, encompassing financials, supply chain, human resources, and more. It is widely deployed across large enterprises, government agencies, and medium-sized organizations globally. Oracle Payments, a component of the Financials module, serves as the centralized payment-processing engine. It manages the entire lifecycle of payments, from initiation through to settlement, and interacts with banks, card networks, and other financial institutions. Given its role, any vulnerability in Oracle Payments can expose sensitive financial data, including transaction details, encryption keys, and API credentials.

The E-Business Suite architecture relies on a multi-tier deployment, with a web application server (such as Oracle WebLogic) handling client requests. The Payments module exposes several endpoints for file transmission, transaction processing, and integration with external systems. The File Transmission component, specifically the ibytransmit endpoint, allows authorized users to transfer payment-related files. However, CVE-2026-46817 reveals that this endpoint was accessible without proper authentication in certain versions.

Details of CVE-2026-46817

According to Oracle's advisory, CVE-2026-46817 affects Oracle Payments versions included in Oracle E-Business Suite releases 12.2.3 through 12.2.15. The vulnerability resides in the File Transmission component and is attributed to improper privilege management, improper authentication, and missing authentication for a critical function. Oracle rated it as easily exploitable, meaning an attacker with network access via HTTP can compromise the system without needing valid credentials.

The core issue is that the ibytransmit servlet does not properly validate the caller's identity or permissions. An unauthenticated attacker can craft a malicious HTTP request that invokes an internal Oracle Java function directly. This function, when redirected with a file path parameter, reads the specified file from the server's filesystem and returns its contents in the HTTP response. The initial exploit attempts observed targeted the /etc/passwd file, which is a standard test for file-read vulnerabilities. However, the technique can be extended to read configuration files such as tnsnames.ora, jdbc.properties, or any file containing database credentials, encryption keys, or payment processor API keys.

The vulnerability does not require any user interaction or prior access. An attacker only needs network connectivity to the EBS web interface. This makes CVE-2026-46817 particularly dangerous for organizations that expose their EBS instances to the internet, whether intentionally or inadvertently.

The Attack Observed

On 27 June 2026, threat intelligence company Defused reported the first in-the-wild exploitation of CVE-2026-46817. Their Oracle E-Business Suite decoys—honeypots designed to mimic real EBS deployments—recorded a single source launching an unauthenticated file-read attack against the Payments component. The exploit targeted the ibytransmit endpoint and successfully retrieved the contents of /etc/passwd from the decoy server. This activity occurred approximately six weeks after Oracle released its patch and before any public proof-of-concept code was known to exist.

The attackers appear to have developed their own exploit independently, possibly through reverse engineering the patch or through other reconnaissance methods. The attack pattern suggests a targeted proof-of-concept rather than broad scanning, as only a single source was involved. However, once a working exploit circulates within the criminal or state-sponsored community, it can quickly be weaponized for mass exploitation. Organizations that have not yet patched are at immediate risk.

Potential Impact

The immediate impact of successful exploitation is the disclosure of sensitive files. An attacker who reads /etc/passwd may gain insight into system accounts, but the greater threat lies in accessing files that contain credentials and secrets. In a typical Oracle E-Business Suite deployment, configuration files often store database usernames and passwords, WebLogic admin credentials, and keys used to communicate with payment gateways. With these credentials, an attacker can escalate privileges, move laterally within the network, and potentially compromise the entire EBS environment.

Furthermore, if the attacker gains access to payment processor API keys, they could intercept or manipulate payment transactions, leading to financial fraud. The Oracle Payments module is a component that processes real financial data, so the consequences of a breach extend beyond data theft to regulatory non-compliance, fines, and reputational damage. Given that many organizations use EBS to comply with PCI DSS and other financial regulations, a breach of the payments module could trigger mandatory disclosure obligations and audits.

It is also worth noting that Oracle E-Business Suite has been a frequent target of attackers in recent years. In 2024 and 2025, several critical vulnerabilities in other EBS components (such as the Oracle Application Object Library and the Oracle Procurement module) were exploited in the wild. The pattern suggests that attackers have invested in tools and techniques specific to Oracle EBS, making it a persistent risk.

Patching and Mitigation Advice

Oracle addressed CVE-2026-46817 in its May 2026 Critical Security Patch Update (CPU). Administrators running Oracle E-Business Suite versions 12.2.3 to 12.2.15 should apply the patch as soon as possible. The CPU is cumulative and includes fixes for other vulnerabilities as well. For organizations that cannot immediately patch, mitigation steps include restricting access to the EBS web interface from the internet. The ibytransmit endpoint should only be accessible from internal trusted networks. Firewall rules and network segmentation can limit exposure.

Security teams should also review their logs for signs of exploitation. Suspicious POST requests to the path /OA_HTML/ibytransmit from unknown IP addresses may indicate attempted or successful attacks. If evidence of compromise is found, a full forensic investigation should be undertaken. This includes checking for file access patterns, examining web server logs for unusual responses (e.g., large responses to unauthenticated requests), and reviewing system file integrity. All credentials and keys stored on the affected host should be rotated immediately, as the attacker may have obtained them.

Given the recurrence of critical EBS vulnerabilities, organizations should evaluate whether their EBS installation truly needs to be accessible from the internet. Many business processes can be served through a VPN or application gateway rather than exposing the web interface directly. For internet-facing deployments, implementing a web application firewall (WAF) with rules to detect and block attempts to access sensitive file paths might provide an additional layer of defense, though it should not replace patching.

Broader Implications for EBS Security

The exploitation of CVE-2026-46817 underscores a broader challenge: the complexity of securing large ERP suites that have been deployed for decades. Oracle E-Business Suite is a legacy product that continues to be widely used, but its codebase has grown organically, leading to occasional oversights in authentication and privilege management. The fact that an unauthenticated file-read vulnerability exists in a payment-processing module is a stark reminder that every exposed component must be hardened.

Organizations should adopt a proactive vulnerability management strategy that extends beyond applying quarterly CPUs. Continuous monitoring for new vulnerabilities, regular penetration testing focusing on Oracle-specific attack paths, and maintaining an up-to-date inventory of all EBS endpoints are essential. Additionally, configuration management should ensure that default settings are reviewed and that unnecessary components are disabled. For instance, if the File Transmission component is not used, it should be deactivated at the application level.

Another layer of defense involves monitoring for unusual API calls. Since the ibytransmit endpoint is not typically accessed by regular users, any request to it should be flagged and investigated. Integrating EBS logs into a security information and event management (SIEM) system enables automated alerting for such events.

The attacker community's ability to develop exploits without a public proof-of-concept indicates a high level of sophistication. It is likely that multiple threat actors are now reverse-engineering Oracle CPUs as soon as they are released, aiming to weaponize patched vulnerabilities before organizations can update. This emphasizes the need for rapid patch deployment, especially for internet-facing systems.

Subscribe to breaking news e-mail alerts to never miss out on the latest breaches, vulnerabilities and cybersecurity threats.

Source: Help Net Security News

Eleven SSH honeypots ran on cloud servers in Frankfurt, Germany, for fifteen days in late May and early June, in a study by researchers at the Czech Technical University in Prague. Together they logged 177,622 authenticated sessions—every one an attacker who got past the login. The split among those sessions was lopsided. Non-interactive sessions, where a client logs in, runs one command, reads the output, and disconnects, accounted for 99.23% of the total. Interactive shell sessions, the kind the honeypot field was built to study, came to 0.10%. File transfers made up the small remainder.

How Non-Interactive Sessions Work

A non-interactive session works in a particular way. The client authenticates, issues a single command through an SSH exec request, and the server closes the channel without allocating a terminal. The whole exchange finishes in under a second—faster than a person can type. These are scanners and exploit scripts running at machine speed, logging in to confirm a fact about the host and moving on. The SSH protocol supports two primary channel types: shell (interactive terminal) and exec (single-command). While shell sessions allocate a pseudo-terminal (PTY) and allow an interactive series of commands, exec sessions execute a specific command and then terminate. This distinction is crucial because the exec channel is optimized for automation, and attackers have fully embraced it.

A Result That Holds on Someone Else’s Sensors

The honeypots ran on a modified version of an open-source tool called AdvancedShelLM, which uses a large language model to generate realistic shell output. A locally hosted model handled most sessions, with two OpenAI models as backup. The backend governed the responses the honeypots returned; the measurement concerned the traffic attackers sent, which the model does not influence. To confirm the result held beyond their own deployment, the researchers compared it against an independent dataset from CZ.NIC, the operator of a honeypot service built on thousands of Cowrie sensors. That dataset held more than a quarter of a million logged-in sessions over the same window. Among sessions that carried at least one command, 92.67% carried exactly one. The pattern held on hardware run by a different operator.

Most of the Traffic Is Reconnaissance

The ten most common non-interactive commands covered 41.59% of that traffic, and most of them gather basic facts about the machine. Variants of uname, which reports the operating system and kernel, sat at the top of the list. Others asked for the processor count, the logged-in user, the graphics hardware, and the system uptime. These commands collect information that tells an automated campaign whether the box is worth a second look. For example, a scanner might check for a specific kernel version that matches a known vulnerability, or verify that the host is not a container with limited resources. This pattern aligns with the broader trend of automated reconnaissance in cyber attacks, where speed and volume are prioritized over human interaction.

Some Scanners Check Whether You Are the Trap

A smaller group of commands had a different job. Some scanners test whether the thing answering them runs commands for real. The team recorded 2,178 sessions of this kind. One campaign sent a base64-encoded string and decoded it—an operation that returns a known answer on a working system. Others asked for simple arithmetic, dumped the contents of a binary, or wrote a file and read it back. This carries weight for the newer class of honeypots built on language models. A model can produce shell output that looks plausible and is wrong. A scanner that checks the math, decodes the string, or confirms that a file persists catches the difference in a single command. Success for these honeypots comes down to surviving that check.

Honeypot operators fingerprinting attackers is old ground. The reverse showed up here as well. A handful of sessions looked for the tells of known honeypots, listing processes for Cowrie or kippo and testing whether system files were writable. The counts were small, and the authors treat them with care. Scanners tested outputs and machine state. The team screened every session for prompt-injection strings and for mentions of AI or model names, and found none of either. Worry about attackers talking their way past a language model has little support in this data, at least for now.

A Habit That Settled Years Ago

The historical record points to a settled behavior. CZ.NIC’s archive runs back to 2017 and holds more than 400 million sessions, and non-interactive traffic has been the majority since around 2018. One sharp move came in October 2024, when the non-interactive share climbed to 97.4% in a single month—a jump of more than seventeen points—alongside a spike in total volume. This suggests that automated scanning campaigns evolve in waves, possibly tied to the release of new exploit kits or changes in the threat landscape. The sustained dominance of non-interactive traffic over several years indicates that this is not a temporary trend but a fundamental shift in attacker behavior. The implication for defenders is clear: resources spent on analyzing interactive shell sessions may miss the vast majority of real-world SSH threats.

Impact on Honeypot Design and Evaluation

The result carries a warning for how honeypots get judged. Many designs measure success by engagement, counting how long an attacker stays and how many commands they run. A traffic stream made almost entirely of single sub-second commands gives those metrics little to work with. A honeypot that only offers an interactive shell, and refuses non-interactive requests, records a version of attacker behavior the honeypot itself created. Researchers and practitioners must rethink evaluation criteria: instead of focusing on session duration or command count, honeypots should be assessed on their ability to capture and classify automated reconnaissance. Furthermore, honeypots that support both interactive and non-interactive channels, and that can simulate realistic responses for exec requests, will provide a more accurate picture of the threat. This includes ensuring that LLM-based systems correctly compute arithmetic, decode base64, and maintain file state across sessions—otherwise they risk being identified and bypassed.

The login attempts filling the logs are mostly triage. An automated client confirms the host is real, files it for later, and leaves. The value sits in recognizing that pattern and grouping the noise into campaigns, so a thousand one-second touches resolve into the handful of operations behind them. By understanding that the vast majority of after-login activity is non-interactive reconnaissance, security teams can better prioritize their defense efforts—focusing on detection signatures for common scanning commands, blocking known scanner IPs, and deploying honeypots that mirror real systems to avoid detection. The era of the lone human intruder typing commands into a terminal is fading; today’s battlefield belongs to machines.

Source: Help Net Security News

In the days following the event, Honan found himself replaying that word — “scared” — like a persistent earworm. His immediate reaction was self-doubt: had he failed to raise awareness about security threats and risks? More importantly, it made him question whether the cybersecurity industry sometimes makes things harder than necessary by describing risks in ways that sound frightening, technical, or overwhelming to people who simply want to understand practical steps to protect themselves and their businesses.

The problem with how we talk about threats

As anyone who has seen Honan speak knows, he is not one for dramatic declarations of impending doom or irresponsible hype. He does not believe in selling security through fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD). Instead, he has always viewed his role as raising awareness of information security as an important business issue.

But after this event, he began to wonder whether his natural tendency to approach security threats simply as risks to be managed might be inadvertently frightening those outside the cybersecurity bubble. When you work with data breaches, CEO fraud, and ransomware day in and day out, these concepts become normalized. To non-experts, they can sound like apocalyptic scenarios.

The conversation with one of the event organizers — a financial planner — drove the point home. The organizer asked Honan if he had appropriate insurance and pension protection for himself and his business. Honan had assumed he had most boxes ticked, yet the conversation sparked a flicker of anxiety: maybe he was missing something crucial. The organizer’s intention was not to scare him; he was simply applying his domain knowledge. Yet Honan, as a non-expert in financial matters, reacted with unease.

What it feels like to be the non-expert in the room

This experience illuminated a critical insight: every professional is an expert in their own field, and venturing into areas outside that expertise naturally provokes varying degrees of worry. For those uninitiated in technology, terms like “advanced persistent threats,” “phishing campaigns,” and “compromised credentials” can sound like dialogue from a spy novel. In reality, these terms often refer to criminals, scams, and fraud — tactics designed to trick people into handing over money or information.

The cybersecurity industry has long been criticized for using jargon that alienates its audience. The problem is not limited to technical terms; it also includes the tone of urgency that many security vendors adopt. When people feel overwhelmed by warnings about cybercrime, they often react in one of two ways: they dismiss the advice because it feels overly complicated or alarmist, or they become so worried about making a mistake that they avoid using technology altogether. Neither response is productive.

Honan’s reflection echoes a broader conversation within the security community. For years, researchers have argued that fear-based messaging can actually reduce protective behaviors. A 2023 study published in the Journal of Cybersecurity found that individuals who received fear-focused security messages were less likely to adopt recommended safeguards than those who received practical, empowering guidance.

The goal is confidence, not expertise

From a security perspective, Honan’s financial planner experience serves as a valuable reminder: what professionals perceive as normal can be frightening to outsiders. The onus is on security experts to think carefully about how they deliver messages — to educate, not intimidate.

The truth is, many business leaders rely on the expertise of professionals in fields like law, finance, and public relations. Those professionals use unfamiliar terminology, but it is not necessary to become an expert in those domains. Instead, the goal is to be sufficiently well-informed to ask the right questions of those providing the expertise.

Similarly, cybersecurity should not be about frightening people with stories of hackers, breaches, and worst-case scenarios. It should be about helping people understand practical steps they can take to reduce risk. This includes recognizing common scams, asking good questions of IT support, making informed decisions about security tools, and feeling confident using technology in daily business operations.

One approach that has gained traction is the use of plain-language analogies. For example, explaining multi-factor authentication as a second lock on a door — simple, effective, and non-intimidating. Another is focusing on specific, actionable advice: “Never click on links in unsolicited emails asking for your password” rather than “Beware of advanced phishing campaigns.”

Honan’s key takeaway is that if people leave a security presentation feeling empowered rather than frightened, the communicator has done their job properly. The challenge for the industry is to move away from a culture of fear and toward a culture of enablement.

This lesson, ironically, came from a financial planner — a professional whose own domain often involves complex products and legal language. Yet that planner knew how to ask questions that sparked reflection without causing panic. It is a model that cybersecurity professionals would do well to emulate.

As organizations continue to face increasingly sophisticated threats — from ransomware to business email compromise to supply chain attacks — the human element remains both the weakest link and the strongest defense. Equipping people with confidence, not fear, is the most sustainable path to better security posture. The industry must retire FUD and replace it with education.

Source: Help Net Security News

Ronaldo 2002: The Haircut Nobody Understood

The most famous case is Ronaldo Nazário during the 2002 World Cup. His bizarre haircut, almost completely shaved with a small patch at the front, quickly became a global talking point. It looked strange, almost ridiculous, and yet it became unforgettable. Years later, Ronaldo revealed the real reason: he wanted to distract the media from a recent injury he had suffered. The strategy worked perfectly. Brazil went on to win the tournament, Ronaldo dominated the stage, and that haircut became legendary. What started as confusion turned into one of the most recognizable looks in sports history.

Ronaldo’s 2002 performance was nothing short of extraordinary. After suffering a career-threatening knee injury in 1999 and a subsequent relapse, many doubted whether he would ever return to his peak. The haircut served as a brilliant psychological move, shifting attention away from his physical condition and onto his impenetrable confidence. He scored eight goals in the tournament, including two in the final against Germany, securing Brazil’s fifth World Cup title. The image of Ronaldo celebrating with that peculiar hairstyle remains etched in the minds of fans worldwide.

Carlos Valderrama: When Hair Becomes Identity

Few players turned their image into a brand like Carlos Valderrama. His iconic blonde afro was impossible to ignore. During the World Cups of the 1990s, Valderrama could be identified instantly, even from distance. His look represented more than style. It embodied a different way of playing football: creative, expressive, and free. It also reflected a growing Latin American presence on the global stage. Valderrama’s afro became synonymous with Colombian football’s golden era, a time when the national team thrilled the world with its flair and unpredictability.

Valderrama was the midfield orchestrator for Colombia, known for his impeccable passing and vision. He played in three World Cups (1990, 1994, 1998) and his hair was as consistent as his performances. The afro required significant maintenance, but Valderrama embraced the attention it brought. He once joked that his hair was worth more than his car. Beyond the laughs, his hairstyle symbolized the individuality and joy that Latin American football brought to the world stage. It was a visual counterpoint to the often scripted and tactical European game, reminding everyone that creativity could still thrive.

Taribo West: Football Meets Art

Then there is Taribo West, who pushed the boundaries of expression. At France 98, his green braids with extensions became one of the most visually striking images of the tournament. It was not just a hairstyle; it was a statement. West was part of a bold Nigerian generation, full of flair and unpredictability. His look mirrored that energy. Every time he stepped onto the pitch, he stood out instantly. Green and white were the colors of the Nigerian flag, and West wore them proudly in his hair, turning his head into a canvas of national pride.

West was a powerful defender, known for his physicality and no-nonsense defending. But off the pitch, he was an artist. His braids evolved in color and complexity over his career, with the 1998 World Cup being the peak of his hair artistry. Alongside teammates like Jay-Jay Okocha and Nwankwo Kanu, West represented a new wave of African football that demanded attention. Their style and skill captivated audiences, and West’s hair became an enduring symbol of that vibrant era. It was a reminder that football could be both beautiful and bold.

Paul Gascoigne: The Mullet That Defined a Generation

English midfielder Paul Gascoigne, affectionately known as Gazza, sported a classic mullet during the 1990 World Cup. His hairstyle, business in the front and party in the back, perfectly matched his personality: unpredictable, creative, and full of chaos. Gascoigne’s mullet became iconic after his emotional tears during the semi-final against West Germany. That image of a crying boy with a mullet touched the hearts of millions and became a defining moment of the tournament. Gazza’s hair was more than a fashion choice; it was a badge of his working-class roots and a symbol of the raw passion he brought to the game.

The mullet was everywhere in the late 80s and early 90s, but Gascoigne made it his own. He played with an infectious joy and a reckless abandon that endeared him to fans. His performances in Italia 90, including a spectacular goal against Scotland and a brilliant assist against the Netherlands, made him a national hero. The mullet became inseparable from his legend. Even years later, when his career declined, people remembered that haircut and the magic it represented.

David Beckham: The Mohawk That Divided a Nation

David Beckham arrived at the 2002 World Cup with a mohawk haircut that sparked endless debate. The England captain had already established himself as a style icon, but this haircut was polarizing. Some saw it as a bold fashion statement; others thought it was an absurd distraction from the serious business of football. Beckham, however, used it to project confidence and rebellion. After his red card against Argentina in 1998 made him a national villain, the mohawk was a way of reclaiming his image and showing that he did not care about the critics.

Beckham’s performance in the 2002 World Cup was solid if not spectacular, but his haircut dominated headlines. He scored a penalty against Argentina, exorcising the demons of 1998, and led England to the quarterfinals. The mohawk became a talking point not just in England but around the world. It was a product of the growing relationship between football and fashion, a trend that Beckham helped pioneer. His ability to blend high-performance athletics with high-end style changed how players approached their public appearances.

Roberto Baggio: The Divine Ponytail

Italian superstar Roberto Baggio was known for his elegant play and his distinctive ponytail. During the 1994 World Cup, Baggio’s ponytail danced behind him as he single-handedly carried Italy to the final. His hair was almost as famous as his silky skills and devastating finishing. The ponytail became a signature, often tied with a black or white ribbon. It added to his mystical aura, earning him the nickname “The Divine Ponytail.” Baggio’s hairstyle was understated compared to others, but it was no less iconic.

The 1994 final was both Baggio’s greatest triumph and his most painful memory. He missed the decisive penalty in the shootout against Brazil, handing the trophy to his opponents. The image of a dejected Baggio, ponytail still perfect, standing alone at the end, became one of the most haunting moments in World Cup history. His ponytail remained through it all, a symbol of grace under pressure. Baggio’s style influenced a generation of Italian footballers who adopted long hair, carrying on his legacy.

Maradona: The 80s Curls That Ruled the World

Diego Maradona’s curly black hair was as iconic as his left foot. In the 1986 World Cup, Maradona’s flowing curls bounced with every dribble as he tore through defenses. His hair was untamed, much like his genius on the pitch. It symbolized his Argentine heritage and his street-football upbringing. Maradona never needed gimmicks; his hair was simply a natural part of his image. Yet it became instantly recognizable. The image of Maradona lifting the World Cup trophy with his curls flying in the air is one of the most celebrated in sports history.

Maradona’s career was full of highs and lows, but his hair remained a constant. It grew longer over the years, becoming a marker of his aging. In the 1994 World Cup, a more mature Maradona with longer hair still showed flashes of brilliance before being sent home after a failed drug test. His hairstyle mirrored his journey: wild, rebellious, and unforgettable. Maradona proved that you do not need an outrageous cut to be iconic; sometimes, natural charisma is enough.

These players are not exceptions. Every World Cup introduces personalities who understand that image matters. Some do it intentionally, others naturally, but the impact is the same: they become unforgettable. From Ronaldo’s deliberate distraction to Valderrama’s proud afro, from West’s Green braids to Gascoigne’s mullet, each haircut tells a story of identity, creativity, and the human side of football. The World Cup is as much about style as it is about skill, and these hairstyles have earned their place in the pantheon of sports history.

Source: beIN SPORTS News

Josephs' dedication to music led her to become a scholar at the Royal Academy of Music. During World War II, she would commute into London, entertaining troops on the train with her viola practice—a testament to her lifelong commitment to sharing her art. After the war, she taught herself the organ, an instrument she has played for decades, and eventually became the organist and choir leader at St Andrew's Church in Walberswick.

Beyond music, Josephs had a distinguished career as the owner and head of a girls' school in Leicestershire. She purchased her cottage in Walberswick around 1986, drawn by the charm of nearby Southwold during summer visits. She has lived there ever since, and retirement is not on her agenda. Once a month, she enjoys leading an evensong at the church, playing the organ despite her declining eyesight. To overcome this challenge, she uses specially enlarged sheet music and memorizes the pieces by practicing last thing at night, a technique she believes sharpens her memory.

The centenary concert will feature Josephs playing the organ alongside a brass quintet and a choir. The event, which includes a touch of champagne, promises to be a joyful celebration. Josephs described her choir as "lovely," and after the performances, they will gather at her home for a drink. Ahead of her birthday, she received a card from King Charles III and Queen Camilla, which delighted her, as she has long felt a connection to the royal family—she married around the same time as Charles, and their children are of similar ages.

Josephs credits music as the secret to her long life, though she humbly notes other factors might play a role. She remains fiercely independent, adamant that she will not move into a care home. Her story is an inspiration, showing that passion and melody can sustain a vibrant, active life well into the second century. The concert is not only a personal celebration but a gift to the community that has supported her for decades.

Source: MSN News

In a development that underscores the fallout, Warren Buffett—the 95-year-old chairman of Berkshire Hathaway and one of Gates’ closest allies—has reportedly paused his hefty annual donations to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. According to sources cited by The Wall Street Journal and later picked up by The Daily Beast, this is the first time in two decades that Buffett has withheld his contribution. The move has raised questions about the future of one of the most celebrated partnerships in modern philanthropy.

The Epstein Files and Gates’ Involvement

The Epstein files, made public in early 2026, brought to light a trove of communications, travel records, and financial transactions linking Epstein to numerous influential figures. Gates appears prominently throughout the documents, with details of meetings, flights on Epstein’s private jet, and conversations. The revelations have tarnished Gates’ image as a global health champion and forced him to confront a relationship he has long tried to downplay.

Gates’ association with Epstein dates back more than a decade. The two were known to have met on several occasions, and Gates had previously acknowledged meeting Epstein for dinners and discussions about philanthropy. However, the newly released files suggest a deeper involvement, including a 2013 trip to Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, which Gates had initially denied. The documents also reveal that Epstein introduced Gates to several women, some of whom were involved in questionable circumstances.

Gates’ Apology to Foundation Staff

In the wake of the file release, Gates addressed employees of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in an internal meeting. He reportedly spoke candidly about his mistakes and answered questions from staff. During the meeting, Gates referenced two extramarital affairs—one with a Russian bridge player and another with a Russian nuclear physicist—claiming Epstein had used these relationships to blackmail him into maintaining their friendship.

“I did nothing illicit,” Gates told the staff, according to a transcript leaked to the press. “I saw nothing illicit.” Nonetheless, he acknowledged the profound error in judgment: “It was a huge mistake to spend time with Epstein.” The apology came after months of internal unease within the foundation, where employees have expressed discomfort over Gates’ ties to a convicted sex offender.

Buffett’s Decision: A Strained Friendship

Warren Buffett and Bill Gates first met in the early 1990s and quickly forged a bond over shared philanthropic interests and a love for bridge. Their partnership culminated in the Giving Pledge, a campaign to encourage billionaires to donate the majority of their wealth. Buffett also became a major benefactor of the Gates Foundation, pledging in 2006 to donate the bulk of his fortune to the organization over time. To date, he has contributed approximately $48 billion.

But the Epstein revelations have strained the relationship. In March 2026, Buffett told CNBC’s Squawk Box that he had not spoken to Gates since the files were unveiled. “I don’t want to be in a position where I know things at the moment. I could get called as a witness,” he explained. When asked about his annual donation, which typically arrives around June 30, Buffett said, “I’ll wait and see what unfolds.”

Now, reports indicate that Buffett has followed through on that hesitation. His decision to pause the donation has sent a strong signal to the foundation and the wider philanthropic community. Buffett has also reportedly reached out to foundation CEO Mark Suzman to inquire about the progress of an internal probe into Gates’ ties with Epstein.

Background: The Gates-Epstein Relationship

The relationship between Gates and Epstein has been a subject of speculation for years. In 2019, The New York Times reported that Gates met with Epstein multiple times after Epstein’s 2008 guilty plea for soliciting a minor and after Epstein’s 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges. Gates initially defended the meetings, saying he was seeking Epstein’s advice on philanthropic endeavors, but later admitted to spending time with him was a “mistake.”

Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial, cultivated a network of wealthy and influential individuals, often leveraging his connections for personal gain. Gates was one of several billionaires, including former President Donald Trump and Prince Andrew, whose names appeared in Epstein’s black book and flight logs.

The January 2026 release of the Epstein Files provided granular details that went beyond previous disclosures. Emails and calendar entries showed Epstein actively trying to leverage his relationship with Gates for business opportunities and to enhance his own reputation. In one email, Epstein boasted to an associate about his “access” to Gates.

The Impact on the Gates Foundation

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the largest private charitable foundation in the world, with an endowment exceeding $70 billion. It focuses on global health, poverty alleviation, and education. Buffett’s donations have been a cornerstone of its funding, accounting for a significant portion of annual expenditures. The pause in Buffett’s contributions, even if temporary, creates uncertainty for grant recipients and program planning.

Internally, the foundation has launched a comprehensive review of all interactions between Gates and Epstein, including whether any foundation resources or reputation were improperly used. The probe is being conducted by an external law firm and is expected to report its findings by mid-2026. Gates has pledged his full cooperation.

The controversy has also affected Gates’ public standing. Once revered as a visionary who pivoted from software to saving lives, his image has been gradually eroded by revelations about his personal life and associations. The Epstein saga has been particularly damaging because it touches on the exploitation of vulnerable women and girls.

Historical Context of Buffett and Gates’ Philanthropy

The friendship between Buffett and Gates has been central to modern philanthropy. In 2010, they launched the Giving Pledge, which has since been signed by over 200 billionaires worldwide. The Gates Foundation itself was established in 2000, initially with a focus on global health. Buffett’s 2006 pledge transformed the foundation into a powerhouse, enabling it to spend billions annually on initiatives like eradicating polio, combating malaria, and improving agricultural practices in developing countries.

Buffett has often praised Gates for his hands-on approach and willingness to learn. In turn, Gates has credited Buffett with shaping his understanding of capitalism and charitable giving. The personal bond between the two men was evident in joint TV appearances, bridge games, and shared vacations. That bond now appears frayed, with Buffett’s actions suggesting a strong desire to distance himself from the fallout.

Reactions from the Philanthropic Community

The news of Buffett’s donation pause has stirred debate among philanthropy experts. Some argue that Buffett is acting prudently, waiting for the internal investigation to conclude before committing further funds. Others see it as a tacit admission that Gates’ judgment was severely compromised and that the foundation’s governance needs reform. There are also concerns that the scandal could deter other wealthy donors from partnering with foundations perceived to have leadership with questionable ethics.

Melinda French Gates, who divorced Bill Gates in 2021, has kept a low profile since the Epstein files were released. She has not publicly commented on Buffett’s decision or the internal probe. However, sources close to her suggest she is troubled by the revelations, which she learned about only after the files became public.

Meanwhile, Gates has been spotted in public less frequently, focusing on damage control behind the scenes. His team has issued several statements reiterating that he “deeply regrets” the association with Epstein and that he has learned from the experience. But the frequency of the revelations and the depth of his involvement continue to hurt his credibility.

Legal and Ethical Implications

Legally, Gates does not face prosecution because his interactions with Epstein do not appear to involve illegal acts on Gates’ part. However, the ethical ramifications are significant. Philanthropy is built on trust and moral authority, and Gates’ willingness to associate with Epstein—long after Epstein’s conviction—has raised questions about the vetting processes within the foundation and the culture of impunity among the ultra-wealthy.

Buffett’s decision to pause donations could be seen as a proxy for broader public sentiment. It signals that even the most loyal and generous supporter cannot ignore the ethical cloud that now hangs over the foundation. For Gates, the road to redemption will likely require more than a single apology; it will demand sustained transparency, robust governance changes, and a prolonged period of clean behavior.

As the foundation continues its internal probe, the philanthropic world is watching closely. The outcome will influence not only the future of Bill Gates’ legacy but also the standards to which all major donors and foundations are held. Buffett’s pause is a stark reminder that in philanthropy, as in business, reputation is everything.

Source: MSN News

Understanding Pogba's Core Strengths

Pogba's effectiveness on the pitch stems from his exceptional physical attributes. Standing at 1.91 meters (6 feet 3 inches) and possessing remarkable core strength, he uses his body as a shield to protect the ball from defenders. This is not just about size; it's about technique. By placing his body between the ball and the opponent, Pogba creates a barrier that allows him to maintain possession in tight spaces. This skill is crucial for midfielders who often face double teams. To replicate this, players should practice receiving passes with their back to goal, using their arms and torso to feel the defender's pressure while keeping the ball on the far foot. Drills like "body shielding 1v1" can be done with a partner: the attacker tries to hold off a defender for five seconds while staying balanced.

Ball Shielding Drills

One effective drill involves setting up a 5x5 meter square. Players take turns being the attacker and defender. The attacker receives a pass and must shield the ball for 10 seconds while the defender tries to dislodge it. Focus on: low center of gravity, bent knees, and arms out for balance. Pogba often uses his back to turn and resist pressure, pivoting around the defender to create space for a pass or shot. This can be practiced with cones representing opponents—players must shield the ball, then accelerate away when an opening appears.

Escaping Pressure: Reading Movement and Quick Decisions

Pogba excels in congested areas because he reads the movement of both teammates and defenders. When facing more than one opponent, he uses feints, body swerves, and sudden changes of direction to break free. For instance, he might fake a pass one way, then drag the ball back with the sole of his foot and spin out. This requires excellent spatial awareness and rapid decision-making. Drills that simulate double teams are ideal: set up two defenders who can only move laterally within a narrow channel. The attacker must dribble through while using quick touches and head fakes. Pogba's signature move—the "Pogback" (a backheel flick)—can also be practiced by having players use the sole of their foot to flick the ball behind their standing leg.

Decision-Making Under Pressure

To improve decision-making, introduce a "3v2" possession game in a 10x10 grid. The three attackers must keep the ball for 20 passes while the two defenders try to intercept. This forces players like Pogba to scan the field constantly, identify passing lines, and choose when to dribble or pass. The key is to increase the speed of play gradually until decisions become instinctive.

Volleys and Finishing: Technical Control in the Air

Pogba's volleys are legendary, from his stunning strike against Juventus in the 2018 Champions League to his goal in the 2018 World Cup final. His ability to control the ball in the air and finish within a few touches is a product of relentless practice. For players wanting to emulate this, start with basic volleying drills: have a partner toss the ball from 10 yards away. The player must volley it back with the instep, focusing on keeping the foot firm and making contact with the ball's center. Progress to crossing drills where the player receives a high ball and must volley on target with one or two touches. Pogba often times his runs to meet crosses at the near post, using his strength to hold off defenders before striking.

Finishing Drill: The One-Touch Volley

Set up cones as defenders 2 yards from goal. A partner feeds balls from the wing. The attacker must take a touch to control the ball, then shoot with the second touch. This simulates game situations where defenders close in quickly. Pogba's composure in these moments comes from practice—he rarely takes unnecessary touches. Add a goalkeeper to increase realism. For advanced players, incorporate a bounce volley: the ball is thrown with backspin, and the player volleys it directly into the net.

Combining Strength, Awareness, and Technique

The true genius of Pogba's game is how he integrates these skills. During a match, he shields the ball while scanning for runners, then delivers a pinpoint pass or drives forward. His strength allows him to hold off defenders while he decides his next move. To develop this holistic ability, create a circuit that combines all elements: start with a body shielding drill (10 seconds), then a quick escape move through two cones, followed by a volley on goal. Repeat 5 times. This conditions the body and mind to transition quickly between defending, dribbling, and finishing.

Historical Context and Career Highlights

Born in Lagny-sur-Marne, France, on March 15, 1993, Paul Pogba rose through the youth ranks of Le Havre before joining Manchester United's academy in 2009. After a well-documented transfer to Juventus in 2012, he developed into one of the world's most complete midfielders, winning four Serie A titles and reaching the Champions League final in 2015. His return to Manchester United in 2016 for a then-world record fee brought additional trophies, including the Europa League in 2017. Pogba's crowning achievement came in 2018 when he scored in the World Cup final as France defeated Croatia 4-2. Despite injuries and controversies, his technical legacy remains influential. Coaches often study his games to teach young players how physicality and finesse can coexist. The drills outlined here are used by academies worldwide, from Manchester United's Carrington base to grassroots clubs in West Africa, demonstrating the universal appeal of his style.

Adapting Pogba's Methods for Amateur Players

Not every player has Pogba's frame, but the principles apply to all. Smaller players can use trickery and low center of gravity instead of brute strength. The key is timing and anticipation. For example, instead of holding the ball for long, a quicker release might be needed. Drills should be scaled: use smaller balls or larger grids for beginners. The emphasis on reading the game remains constant. Pogba often says in interviews that his best skill is his mind—understanding where space will open up before it does. Players can develop this by watching full matches without the ball, focusing on movement off the ball.

Advanced Tactical Concepts

At the highest level, Pogba's role varies between a deep-lying playmaker, a box-to-box dynamo, and an advanced attacker. His defensive contributions, including interceptions and tackles, are often overlooked. He averages 1.5 tackles per game in his career, but his positioning is what sets him apart. In training, replicate this by having a midfielder drop into a back three during build-up, then surge forward when the ball enters the final third. This requires stamina and intelligence. Pogba's ability to switch play with long diagonal balls also stems from his upper-body strength and accuracy. Practice long passes with both feet, aiming for a target 40 yards away. Consistency comes from repetition.

The Role of Creativity and Flair

Pogba's no-look passes, backheel flicks, and rainbow flicks are not mere showboating—they serve a purpose. They unbalance defenders and create openings where none existed. For young players, it's important to encourage creativity while emphasizing that it must serve the team. In training, allow unstructured time for freestyle drills, then incorporate those moves into pressured scenarios. For instance, after a backheel flick, the player must immediately run to support a teammate.

Nutrition and Conditioning: The Foundation

Pogba's durability (despite some injury-prone seasons) is built on careful conditioning. His training regimen includes high-intensity interval running, plyometrics, and core work. His diet is rich in lean proteins, complex carbohydrates, and hydration. Amateur players can adopt similar routines: 20 minutes of bodyweight exercises (planks, squats, lunges) three times a week, combined with sprints of varying distances. This builds the explosive power needed for shielding and shooting. Also, sleep and recovery are paramount—Pogba reportedly sleeps 8–9 hours per night and uses cryotherapy. While not all can afford that, consistent rest improves decision-making speed.

Mental Toughness and Leadership

Pogba has faced immense criticism throughout his career, yet he continues to perform on big stages. His mental resilience is as important as his physical skills. Players can build this through visualization techniques—imagining executing perfect volleys or escaping pressure. Pre-game routines, like deep breathing and positive self-talk, help maintain focus. In training, simulate high-pressure penalties or last-minute scenarios where one mistake costs the game. This prepares the mind for real matches.

By studying Paul Pogba's techniques and applying these drills, any soccer player can improve their strength, shielding, creativity, and finishing. The beauty of soccer lies in its simplicity: a ball, some space, and the will to learn. Whether you're a weekend warrior or an aspiring professional, these skills will elevate your game. Start with the basics, be patient, and let the flair emerge naturally.

Source: MSN News

Delrahim, a former assistant attorney general for the Antitrust Division himself, specifically targeted Netflix’s alleged efforts to sway the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, a powerful union representing 1.3 million workers, including film and TV crew members. The Teamsters had sent their own letter to the DOJ in March, urging the agency to block the merger unless substantial safeguards were enacted to protect domestic production and jobs. Delrahim’s response argues that these concerns are misguided and driven by Netflix’s panic over losing ground to a combined Paramount-WBD entity.

“Indeed, Netflix’s panic-level response and scorched-earth campaign to try and poison regulators and other stakeholders against the Transaction shows just how seriously Netflix takes Paramount as a scaled competitor,” Delrahim wrote. He emphasized that the combined company would actually increase content production, not shrink it, and would create more jobs across the industry—from writers and directors to drivers, caterers, and animal handlers.

Background: The Proposed Merger and Industry Context

The Paramount-WBD merger would bring together two of Hollywood’s oldest and most storied studios. Paramount Pictures, now under the umbrella of Paramount Global following its merger with Skydance Media in 2025, is known for blockbuster franchises like “Mission: Impossible,” “Top Gun,” and “Star Trek.” Warner Bros. Discovery, formed in 2022 from the merger of WarnerMedia and Discovery Inc., owns vast assets including HBO, CNN, the Warner Bros. film studio, and a massive library of iconic IP such as “Harry Potter,” “DC Comics,” and “Game of Thrones.” Together, the combined company would rival Disney and Netflix in scale, controlling not only movie and TV production but also multiple streaming services (Paramount+ and Max) and a vast array of cable channels.

However, the deal comes with significant financial baggage. Paramount Global reported over $15 billion in long-term debt as of early 2025, while Warner Bros. Discovery carries approximately $44 billion in debt. The merged entity would inherit roughly $79 billion in total indebtedness, raising concerns about its ability to invest in content without further cost-cutting. A January SEC filing from Paramount explicitly stated that the combined company expects to reduce content spending by less than 10%, though it pledged that none of those cuts would come from film or TV studios.

Paramount CEO David Ellison has publicly committed to releasing at least 30 feature films annually, each with a theatrical window of at least 45 days—a promise aimed at reassuring theater owners and talent that the merged company will prioritize the big screen. Ellison has been making this pledge since February, even as some analysts question whether such a volume is sustainable given the debt load.

The Role of Netflix: Panic or Competition?

Netflix’s alleged interference is notable given that the streaming giant itself considered acquiring Paramount in early 2025 before backing out of negotiations in February. According to Delrahim, Netflix has been actively lobbying union leaders and other stakeholders, warning that the Paramount-WBD merger would mirror the negative outcomes of Disney’s 2019 acquisition of 21st Century Fox. That deal resulted in eliminated production units, significant job losses, and canceled projects—a narrative the Teamsters echoed in their March letter.

Delrahim countered that the comparison is flawed. He pointed out that Disney had already modified its feature film release strategy before buying Fox, and that the COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted Disney’s theatrical plans. Furthermore, he claimed that the number of wide-release theatrical films in the U.S. increased from 2019 to 2025, and that Disney’s content spending actually grew from $5 billion in 2019 to $24 billion expected in 2026. However, this claim is contested: Disney’s 2019 10-K filing showed content spending on film and television production at $7.1 billion, plus $10.5 billion on program licenses and rights, totaling around $17.6 billion—not $5 billion. Analysts have placed Disney’s total content spend in 2019 closer to $28 billion, making 2026’s projected $24 billion a decrease, not an increase as Delrahim suggested.

Netflix responded to Delrahim’s letter by calling the accusations “absurd.” A spokesperson stated, “We walked away from this deal months ago and remain focused on our own business, not theirs. Ultimately, it’s up to the regulators to approve this deal and determine if it is in the best interest of the industry and all concerned.” This refutation aligns with Netflix’s public stance of staying out of other companies’ merger battles, but the letters suggest otherwise.

Labor Concerns and Job Losses

The Teamsters’ opposition centers on fears that the merger will lead to layoffs among production workers. In their March letter, the union argued that Paramount and WBD would eliminate duplicative roles in back-office, finance, legal, and technology departments, which could indirectly affect production work. Paramount’s own SEC filings acknowledge that the merger aims to save over $6 billion through “duplicative operations across all aspects of the business—specifically back office, finance, corporate, legal, technology, infrastructure and real estate.”

Delrahim’s letter attempted to draw a line between back-office cuts and production jobs. He insisted that the merged company would not reduce headcount in production, “studio operations staff, or the skilled trade labor that the Teamsters and other unions represent.” He went further, arguing that increased content output would lead to more work for everyone. “More films and series in production means more call sheets, more location days, more transportation, casting, and catering work,” he wrote.

Yet the union remains skeptical. The Teamsters have not commented on Delrahim’s latest letter, but their previous statements suggest they expect binding commitments rather than promises. The group has historically been vigilant about mergers that concentrate power among a few studios, as seen in the aftermath of the Disney-Fox deal, which resulted in thousands of job losses in the film industry.

Antisemitism Allegations and Political Overtones

Perhaps the most controversial aspect of Delrahim’s defense is his suggestion that opposition to the merger is partly fueled by antisemitism. In an interview with the Los Angeles Times earlier in June, Delrahim claimed, “Let’s be honest. There’s a lot of fear-mongering, particularly from people in Washington, D.C. They are running a political campaign. Some of these people are trying to inflict harm on this transaction really because of their own antisemitic views. Regulators and law enforcement officials will see right through that.”

This accusation has drawn criticism from many quarters, as it conflates legitimate antitrust and labor concerns with bigotry. Neither Delrahim nor Paramount provided specific evidence to support the claim. The Teamsters, the DOJ, and other stakeholders have not responded to this particular allegation. It remains to be seen whether such rhetoric will influence the antitrust review process.

The DOJ’s Antitrust Division is currently reviewing the merger to determine if it would substantially lessen competition in film production, distribution, and streaming. The unit has a history of challenging or imposing conditions on large media mergers, such as the failed AT&T-Time Warner deal (later abandoned) and the approval of Disney-Fox with divestitures. The Paramount-WBD case is further complicated by the financial fragility of both companies, which could lead regulators to argue that the merger is necessary for their survival—or alternatively, that it creates a debt-laden giant too unstable to benefit consumers.

Industry observers note that Netflix’s actions, whether real or perceived, highlight the competitive dynamics at play. Netflix, with over 300 million subscribers globally, remains the dominant player in streaming, but it faces increasing competition from Disney+, Amazon Prime Video, and now a potentially stronger Paramount-WBD. A combined Paramount-WBD would have the content library, film studio output, and broadcast network reach to negotiate better terms with talent and advertisers—threatening Netflix’s ability to attract top talent and exclusive content. Delrahim’s letter suggests that Netflix’s “panic-level response” is a sign that it sees the Writing on the Wall.

As the regulatory process unfolds, the key questions remain: Can the merged company deliver on its promises of increased production without massive cost savings that harm workers? Will the DOJ accept Paramount’s assurances, or will it demand structural remedies? And how will the public’s perception of corporate consolidation—already shaped by the Disney-Fox aftermath and the ongoing writers’ and actors’ strikes of recent years—influence the political landscape? The letter from Delrahim is just one piece of a complex puzzle that will define the future of Hollywood for years to come.

In the meantime, Paramount has declined to comment further on the letter, and the Teamsters have not issued a response. The DOJ has not indicated when it will announce its decision on the merger. The battle lines are drawn, with Paramount accusing Netflix of a scorched-earth campaign while Netflix insists it has moved on. The ultimate verdict rests with regulators who must balance competitive concerns, labor protections, and the realities of a rapidly changing media industry.

Source: Ars Technica News

The removed code included libraries explicitly built for face detection and recognition, as well as the modules that would process captured faces into unique biometric signatures—commonly called faceprints—and compare them against a database of stored faceprints on the user’s device. When faces could not be identified, the app would crop, index, and store the images locally for potential future matching. The latest version of the app, released after the story broke, no longer contains any of these components. Meta’s vice president of communications, Andy Stone, told WIRED on Monday that the feature was purely an internal exploration and that no final decision had been made on whether to deploy it to users.

The NameTag system first came to public light in February, when The New York Times reported, based on internal Meta documents, that the company was developing face recognition for its smart glasses and considering a launch as early as that year. One internal memo reportedly suggested releasing the feature during a “dynamic political environment,” when privacy and civil liberties advocates would be preoccupied. WIRED’s subsequent investigation found that much of NameTag’s machinery had been present inside the Meta AI app since at least January 2025, even as Meta publicly maintained that no final decision about face recognition had been made.

Meta’s Response and Denials

Following WIRED’s report, Stone initially dismissed the findings, telling the publication that the company could not answer specific questions because “the feature does not exist.” Meta’s chief technology officer, Andrew Bosworth, went further, characterizing the reporting as “incredibly misleading” and “absolutely dishonest.” Meta declined to answer a series of ten questions that WIRED posed before the story was published, including whether it had already created the database of face profiles that NameTag would use, how long the app retains photographs and biometric data of unrecognized people stored on a user’s device, and whether that data would ever be transmitted back to Meta’s servers.

Additionally, Meta did not respond to questions about whether NameTag was being built specifically for blind or low-vision users, and did not address criticism from privacy advocates who warned that the system could enable stalkers or abusers to identify strangers in public. The company also remained silent on whether users would be given the opportunity to opt in or opt out of the technology.

With the removal of the code, the app no longer contains the face recognition software itself, the processes that executed the NameTag recognition workflow, or the alert that would have notified the user when a person in view was identified (“Person recognized”). The update also removed a dedicated folder designed to store cropped images and biometric signatures of faces the system could not match. A few residual fragments remain—an internal debug menu label and a dormant link meant to open a recognized person’s profile—but the core functionality is gone.

Privacy Concerns and Legal Gaps

Kade Crockford, director of the technology for liberty program at the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, argued that the removal of the code does not undo the decision to ship it in the first place. Crockford called the incident a clear signal that consumer privacy protections need to be substantially stronger than what Congress has been willing to enact. They pointed to the Massachusetts House of Representatives’ recent unanimous passage of a consumer privacy bill that, if enacted as written, would impose strong enforcement provisions, including a private right of action that allows aggrieved users to sue companies that misuse their data. “State lawmakers need to do their job and step up to protect consumer privacy,” Crockford said. “Meta’s sneaky tactics in slipping the face-recognition code into its smart glasses show exactly why data privacy bills need the teeth of strong enforcement. Companies like Meta prioritize their bottom line, so lawmakers need to speak in the only language its C-suite understands.”

The incident is the latest in a long history of privacy controversies involving Meta and its founder, Mark Zuckerberg. The company has faced multiple scandals over the use of facial recognition technology, including a $650 million class-action settlement in Illinois in 2021 over its now-shuttered face tagging system, which violated the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). That settlement covered claims that Facebook collected and stored biometric data without proper consent. The company later announced it would shut down its facial recognition system entirely in November 2021, citing “growing concerns about the use of this technology.” The return of such capabilities in a new product—embedded in a device that can be used surreptitiously—raises fresh alarms.

Smart glasses with a built-in camera and always-on internet connectivity present particular risks. Wearers can capture images and video of people around them without those individuals knowing. If facial recognition were enabled, a user could instantly identify strangers by matching their faces against a database of previous contacts or even public social media profiles. Privacy advocates have long warned that such a capability could be exploited for stalking, harassment, and unwarranted surveillance. The fact that Meta was reportedly considering launching the feature during a politically turbulent time suggests that the company may have been aware of the potential backlash and sought to minimize attention.

Despite the removal of the code, the company has not committed to not reintroducing it. Stone’s statement that “no final decision has been made on what to do here, if anything” leaves the door open for future iterations. Meanwhile, the remnants of NameTag in the app’s code serve as a reminder of how close the feature came to being deployed on a massive scale. The episode also underscores the broader debate over the ethics of facial recognition technology, especially when deployed in public spaces without explicit consent. Regulators in the European Union have already taken a strict stance, with the GDPR and the proposed AI Act imposing heavy restrictions on biometric identification. In the United States, however, federal legislation remains anemic, leaving consumers at the mercy of corporate self-regulation.

Several other states, including Washington and Texas, have moved to adopt biometric privacy laws similar to Illinois, but nationwide coverage remains a patchwork. Legal experts argue that the NameTag incident may provide the necessary momentum for Congress to finally act. “The specter of millions of people being scanned and identified by a common consumer device is exactly the kind of concrete threat that lawmakers should respond to,” said a law professor specializing in privacy at Georgetown University. “We need clear rules that say you cannot collect or use biometric data without informed consent, and you must have robust security measures to prevent misuse.” The professor spoke on condition of anonymity because they consulted with advocacy groups tracking the issue.

As tech companies continue to blur the lines between the digital and physical worlds, the case of Meta’s NameTag serves as a cautionary tale. It demonstrates how quickly a controversial feature can be built, packaged into an app, and prepared for mass distribution—all while the company publicly denies its existence. The only reason the public knows about it is because journalists and researchers examined the code. Without such scrutiny, the feature could have been switched on silently, affecting millions of users and those around them.

Moving forward, transparency advocates are calling on Meta to publish a clear policy on facial recognition for all its products, including smart glasses. They also want the company to commit to never deploying such technology without first giving users a meaningful choice to opt in. Meta has not responded to these requests. Meanwhile, the remnants of NameTag in the latest version of Meta AI suggest that the company may not have completely abandoned the idea. For now, the face recognition code is gone—but the infrastructure that allowed it to exist remains, ready to be reactivated with the next software update.

Source: Ars Technica News

What the Amendment Changes

The amendment deletes the previous Section VI(2)(B) of the Conde Nast User Agreement and substitutes it with a new paragraph. Under the old language, the scope of the license granted to Conde Nast was arguably more limited. The new clause dramatically broadens the company's rights while still asserting that users “retain ownership of all rights, title, and interests” in their content. However, the fine print reveals an extensive, irrevocable license that allows Conde Nast to use user content in almost any way imaginable—as long as it is “on or in connection with the Service, or the promotion thereof.”

The license includes the right to “copy, reproduce, modify, edit, crop, alter, revise, adapt, translate, enhance, reformat, remix, rearrange, resize, create derivative works of, move, remove, delete, erase, reverse-engineer, store, cache, aggregate, publish, post, display, distribute, broadcast, perform, transmit, rent, sell, share, sublicense, syndicate, or otherwise provide to others, use, or change all such Content.” This laundry list of verbs essentially grants Conde Nast the ability to do almost anything with user-submitted material, from republishing it across other platforms to using it in advertising campaigns, all without additional compensation or attribution to the original creator.

Key Implications for Users

For Ars Technica readers who actively participate in the site’s forums, comment sections, or other interactive features, this change has real consequences. Any comments, forum posts, images, or other content submitted become raw material that Conde Nast can repurpose at will. Crucially, the license is “royalty-free” and “perpetual,” meaning the company never has to pay the user and the authorization does not expire, even if the user later deletes their account or removes the content from the site.

The phrase “on or in connection with the Service, or the promotion thereof” is a common but expansive legal hook. It covers not only using a comment to illustrate a story on Ars Technica itself but also using that same comment in a promotional tweet, a billboard ad for the website, or even a compilation of “best comments” sold as a book. The language “in any medium (now in existence or hereinafter developed)” ensures the license remains valid even for future technologies that do not yet exist.

Understanding Content Licensing in the Digital Age

This kind of broad license is not unique to Conde Nast. Most social media platforms—Facebook, Twitter, Instagram—operate under similar terms. Users grant the platform a license to use their content to provide, promote, and improve the service. The rationale is that without such a license, the platform could not legally display a user’s comment next to an article, or re-share a meme across its internal systems. However, the scope of these licenses has become a subject of debate, especially when platforms use user content for training AI models, creating derivative works, or licensing content to third parties for profit.

For a niche, subscription-based site like Ars Technica, the license might seem less concerning because most user contributions are textual comments rather than rich media. However, the license also applies to any images, videos, or other files users upload. A photographer who uploads a high-quality photo to illustrate a forum post could find that image used in a Conde Nast marketing email or featured on another Conde Nast site without permission or payment.

The Legal Labyrinth of “Merchantability and Fitness”

The new clause also includes an unusual detail: it covers “any ideas, suggestions, developments, and/or inventions that you post, upload, transmit, send or otherwise make available.” This means that if a user proposes a new feature for Ars Technica in a comment, Conde Nast is free to implement that feature without compensating the user. Similarly, if someone posts a detailed how-to guide or a creative work of fiction in the comments, that content becomes licensed for the company’s use.

Furthermore, the amendment explicitly states that the license applies regardless of “whether the work qualifies for copyright, trademark, patent, or other proprietary protection.” This is significant because it means even non-copyrightable facts or small snippets of dialogue are covered. The company effectively obtains an all-encompassing, unlimited window into every submission.

Historical Context and Precedents

This is not the first time Conde Nast has revised its terms. In 2019, a similar update to the general Conde Nast user agreement sparked controversy among online creators. That version also included a broad license, but the current Ars Technica-specific amendment removes a limitation that previously limited the license to “displaying and distributing” content. Now the license includes selling, sublicensing, and creating derivative works.

Case law surrounding such licenses is mixed. In the United States, courts have generally upheld companies’ rights to use user content for internal purposes and promotion, as long as the license language is clear. However, when companies have attempted to exploit user content far beyond what a reasonable person would expect—as in the case of a viral photo used in paid advertisements—courts have sometimes ruled in favor of users under the Lanham Act or state right-of-publicity laws. But those cases often hinge on false endorsement or invasion of privacy, not on breach of contract, since the contract language explicitly allows such uses.

What Users Can Do

Ars Technica users who are uncomfortable with these terms have limited options. The license applies to any content posted after the amendment went into effect. Previous content remains governed by the old agreement, but users considering future submissions should be aware that they are granting this permission. Users can avoid posting original content—stick to quotes from public sources or generic opinions. Alternatively, they can stop using the interactive features of the site entirely and simply consume articles without logging in or commenting.

For those concerned about privacy, the amendment also works in conjunction with Conde Nast’s privacy policy, which outlines how personal data is collected and used. While the license does not explicitly grant access to personal information like email addresses, it does cover “any communications with us” – which could include messages sent to the editorial team or customer service.

Some users may hope that the “on or in connection with the Service” limitation will protect them from having their words used in completely unrelated contexts. But the definition of “Service” is tied to Ars Technica and its related properties, which could include sub-brands, events, and mobile apps. Moreover, “promotion thereof” is a broad term that could extend to any marketing effort by Conde Nast as a whole.

The Broader Shift in Online Platforms

This amendment is part of a larger trend where media companies and tech platforms increasingly assert expansive rights over user-generated content. The business model of the internet relies on users being willing to contribute content for free, which platforms then leverage for engagement and monetization. From Reddit’s API debacle to Meta’s use of public posts for AI training, user content has become a valuable asset.

In the case of Ars Technica, which operates on a subscription model and is known for its high-quality journalism and technical depth, the amendment may not drastically change the user experience. The site has a passionate community that often engages in detailed, insightful discussions. Many users may never notice the legal update, and only a small fraction will read the fine print. Yet for those who do, the change serves as a reminder that every comment, every photo, every tip submitted becomes a piece of intellectual property that the platform can exploit.

Conde Nast’s move also highlights the tension between copyright ownership and the practical needs of operating a digital service. Without a license, the company would need to seek individual permission to republish a comment in a “best of” article or to display a user-uploaded image in a photo gallery. The blanket license solves that problem efficiently but at the cost of user control.

The amendment does not contain an opt-out mechanism. Users cannot selectively grant permission for certain uses. Accepting the terms of service is a condition of using the site’s interactive features. Those who do not agree are effectively limited to reading content only.

More Than Just Legalese

While the language is dense and legalistic, the real-world impact can be significant. Consider an Ars Technica forum thread where a user posts a detailed guide on how to repair a broken screen. Under the new license, Conde Nast could extract that guide, repackage it as a standalone article, place it behind a paywall, and even sell it as part of a special report—all without ever contacting the original author. The author would see no compensation and might not even know their work was reused.

Similarly, a user who uploads a unique photograph of a rare astronomical event could see that image appear in an Ars Technica wallpaper pack, a promotional video, or a third-party publication licensed by Conde Nast. The potential for commercial exploitation is vast, and the only limit is that the use must be “on or in connection with the Service, or the promotion thereof.” Legal experts might argue over the boundaries of that phrase, but in practice, it gives the company enormous latitude.

The amendment also clarifies that the license is “irrevocable.” Even if the user deletes their account or demands the removal of their content, Conde Nast may continue to use any copies it has already made. This is standard practice in many online platforms, but it underscores the permanent nature of the grant.

What Security and Privacy Experts Say

Privacy advocates often warn that such licenses can have unintended consequences, especially when combined with data collection. While the attribution requirement is waived, the content itself can be mined for personal insights. A frequent commenter who shares opinions on various technical topics might inadvertently provide a rich dataset for profiling or targeted advertising. Though Conde Nast’s privacy policy separates content from personal data, the aggregation of both can lead to comprehensive user profiles.

Furthermore, the clause about “reverse-engineering” is noteworthy. It gives Conde Nast the right to reverse-engineer any material a user posts. If a user uploads a piece of software code as part of a discussion, the company could legally decompile it and examine its inner workings, potentially even using that knowledge to improve its own products. This goes beyond typical use for a news site and suggests a broad reach into users’ creative works.

Despite these concerns, many users will accept the terms without a second thought. The convenience of participating in an online community often outweighs the theoretical risks. For others, the amendment may be a tipping point, prompting them to migrate to more user-friendly platforms or to engage in more private interactions.

The amendment is effective immediately for all new users and for existing users who continue to use the site. It does not require explicit consent beyond continued use, which is considered acceptance under typical terms of service law. Therefore, anyone who posts a comment on Ars Technica after the amendment was published has automatically agreed to the new license.

In summary, the change to Section VI(2)(B) replaces a narrower license with an extraordinarily broad one. The company now has the right to use user content in nearly any manner related to the service or its promotion, in perpetuity, without compensation. This is a significant shift in the relationship between Ars Technica and its readers, placing more power in the hands of the publisher and less in the hands of the content creators. As digital platforms continue to evolve, such amendments are likely to become more common, making it essential for users to read and understand the terms they agree to.

Source: Ars Technica News

'Bitch' failed to chart on the Billboard 200 entirely, a far cry from the success of 'Special', whose lead single 'About Damn Time' hit number one and won a Grammy for Record of the Year. Lizzo admitted that for about 24 hours, she based her self-worth on the sales figures, a mistake she now recognizes. 'I meditated and prayed on it and realized that I should not judge my success or my impact on numbers because it's soul-crushing if you do,' she said.

The singer, born Melissa Jefferson, rose to fame in 2019 with the chart-topping single 'Truth Hurts' and has since become known for her empowering anthems and bold personality. Her career has been marked by a series of hits, including 'Juice', 'Good as Hell', and 'Tempo', and she has won multiple Grammy Awards. However, the release of 'Bitch' has been overshadowed by a workplace misconduct lawsuit filed by her former dancers in 2023, which accuses her of assault, false imprisonment, and sexual harassment. Lizzo has repeatedly denied these allegations, and the civil case is still ongoing.

In the interview, Lizzo revealed that she took the poor sales 'to heart really, really heavily' because she is proud of the new music. 'I was really stressed and I was really sad for a few days, because I just was like, 'Wait a minute. This is some of my best stuff. I want people to find it,'' she said. She acknowledged that her 'connection, musically, with the world is different' now than it once was, a realization she had to come to terms with.

Earlier this month, Lizzo responded on X (formerly Twitter) to a post suggesting she no longer has a fanbase. She attributed the decline to the fact that 'streaming replaced radio & I was a radio darling,' and also cited the 'very obvious & public attack on my career changed things,' referring to the lawsuit. This public struggle has been a central theme in her recent narrative.

Speaking with USA TODAY ahead of the album's release, Lizzo described 'Bitch' as an act of 'reclaiming who I am.' She explained, 'A lot of my identity has been manipulated by people outside of me, so this album is me taking that back − showing the Lizzo everybody knows and loves, letting her tell her side of the story and just letting her play again.' The album was released on June 5 and is her first studio album since the lawsuit was filed.

The lawsuit, filed by former dancers Crystal Williams, Noelle Rodriguez, and Arianna Davis in August 2023, alleges a hostile work environment. Lizzo has vehemently denied the claims, and her legal team has described them as 'sensationalized stories.' The case has been a significant distraction from her music, though she has continued to perform and release new material.

Lizzo's career has been a rollercoaster of highs and lows. She started as a flutist and rapper in Houston, later moving to Minneapolis where she joined the indie music scene. Her breakthrough came with the 2019 album 'Cuz I Love You', which cemented her status as a pop star. She has also been a vocal advocate for body positivity, mental health, and social justice, using her platform to promote self-love and acceptance.

The poor sales of 'Bitch' have sparked discussions about the changing landscape of the music industry, where streaming has largely replaced radio as the primary way consumers discover new music. Lizzo herself noted that she was a 'radio darling,' and the shift has made it harder for her to connect with audiences. Additionally, the legal battle has likely affected her public perception, as some fans may have been influenced by the allegations.

Despite the setbacks, Lizzo remains determined to share her music. She continues to tour and engage with fans on social media. In the interview, she expressed hope that people will still discover 'Bitch' and appreciate it for what it is. 'I want people to find it,' she said, emphasizing the importance of the album to her personal narrative.

The album 'Bitch' features a mix of upbeat tracks and introspective ballads, showcasing Lizzo's versatility as an artist. Songs like 'Play It Again' and 'Reclaim' address themes of resilience and self-empowerment, while others like 'No Apologies' directly confront the controversy surrounding her. Critics have noted that the album is more personal than her previous work, reflecting the turmoil of the past few years.

As the legal battle continues, Lizzo's focus remains on her music and her fans. She has expressed gratitude for those who have supported her through difficult times. In the interview, she said, 'I had to reframe and be like, 'But aren't you proud of yourself?' And I was like, 'Yeah, I actually am proud of myself. Aren't you excited to sing these songs? Aren't you glad they're out?' Yeah.' This positive outlook, despite the commercial disappointment, demonstrates her resilience.

The story of Lizzo's recent struggles is a reminder of the pressures faced by artists in the public eye. While her album sales may have been low, her impact on pop culture and her influence on the conversation around body image and authenticity remain significant. Only time will tell how her career evolves, but for now, she is committed to staying true to herself and her art.

Source: USA TODAY News